Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22431 - 22440 of 50107 for our.

[PDF] State v. Keith A. Glass
that … it’s unduly suggestive in any way and [ ] will not suppress the array. ¶10 Our independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4323 - 2017-09-19

Certification
of powers doctrine. Many more cases bear on the issues, but we will limit our discussion to the four
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61893 - 2011-03-23

COURT OF APPEALS
“participated personally and substantially as a judge” in the child support case, and therefore, our issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86688 - 2012-09-04

[PDF] CA Blank Order
would also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105608 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
our review of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude that no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248821 - 2019-10-15

[PDF] State v. Joseph P. Racicot
to apply a statute whose meaning is in dispute, our efforts are directed at determining legislative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12337 - 2017-09-21

State v. Corey J. Wiseman
ineffective assistance of counsel postconviction motion. Wiseman presents four issues for our review: first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8348 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
but the temporary lockup issue. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 Our certiorari review is limited to the record created
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32518 - 2008-04-23

[PDF] State v. Randy O. Bohardt
guns and that is the one that is going to win." The court acknowledged that our system
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10111 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the affidavit. No. 2020AP1922-CRNM 5 We turn to the issues we have considered after our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=596700 - 2022-12-07