Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22441 - 22450 of 57903 for WA 0859 3970 0884 Tukang Pasang Plafon PVC Ide Terpercaya Delanggu Klaten.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
explanation. Id. The circuit court then must determine whether the defendant has proved purposeful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308953 - 2020-12-02

[PDF] State v. Jody L. Stehle
of prejudice is made. See id. at 588, 543 N.W.2d at 513-14. Prejudice is presumed when a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12389 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James E. Gray
of whether the evidence was direct or circumstantial, see id. at 503, and regardless of whether the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14818 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on that misinformation in reaching the sentence imposed. Id., ¶26. The supplemental no-merit report concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102211 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael J. Arpke
of the criminal code.” Id. Thus, Arpke is properly held to know that he was in peril of prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2868 - 2017-09-19

County of Winnebago v. Gary A. Burns
suspect in light of his or her training and experience. Id. If reasonable suspicion exists, the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4648 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
as declaratory relief.” Id. We proceed to the merits not because declaratory relief is the most appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32112 - 2008-03-17

[PDF] NOTICE
discretion, the credits should be applied to the sentence that is first imposed. Id. at 100
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44845 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The decision to grant or deny the motion rests within the circuit court’s sound discretion. Id., ¶29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110227 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, and we affirmed. See id., ¶1. ¶4 In 2011, Sterling, pro se, filed the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97549 - 2013-06-03