Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22441 - 22450 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 22441 - 22450 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Jerry L. Anderson
of the elements the State would have to prove if Anderson went to trial, confirmed the details of Anderson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11462 - 2017-09-19
of the elements the State would have to prove if Anderson went to trial, confirmed the details of Anderson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11462 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
homicide. We first address his argument that his trial counsel was ineffective by not consulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90204 - 2012-12-05
homicide. We first address his argument that his trial counsel was ineffective by not consulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90204 - 2012-12-05
State v. Tommy Donnell Forrest
the trial court is not obligated to inform Forrest of the collateral consequences of his plea, and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20237 - 2005-12-21
the trial court is not obligated to inform Forrest of the collateral consequences of his plea, and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20237 - 2005-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
constitutes “plain error” entitling him to a new trial; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865519 - 2024-10-23
constitutes “plain error” entitling him to a new trial; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865519 - 2024-10-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
Jeffrey A. Kremers presided at the trial and entered the judgment of conviction. The Honorable Joseph R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33999 - 2014-09-15
Jeffrey A. Kremers presided at the trial and entered the judgment of conviction. The Honorable Joseph R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33999 - 2014-09-15
State v. Henry E. Stothard
. The trial court weighed the testimony it had before it and found Dyer's testimony to be more reliable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11178 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court weighed the testimony it had before it and found Dyer's testimony to be more reliable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11178 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
misdemeanor charges in the amended information. At sentencing, the trial court imposed consecutive nine-month
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122104 - 2014-09-23
misdemeanor charges in the amended information. At sentencing, the trial court imposed consecutive nine-month
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122104 - 2014-09-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
-degree intentional homicide. The basic facts of the trial and Grosskopf’s postconviction proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26773 - 2006-10-11
-degree intentional homicide. The basic facts of the trial and Grosskopf’s postconviction proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26773 - 2006-10-11
State v. John C. Schroeder
to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats.[1] Schroeder contends that the trial court erred by admitting a blood analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14481 - 2005-03-31
to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats.[1] Schroeder contends that the trial court erred by admitting a blood analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14481 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that: (1) the trial court lacked jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33999 - 2008-09-15
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that: (1) the trial court lacked jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33999 - 2008-09-15