Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22451 - 22460 of 69399 for as he.
Search results 22451 - 22460 of 69399 for as he.
[PDF]
State v. Kurt W. Warrington
, performed the analysis. He was not called to testify, since he was on vacation. On appeal, Warrington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8078 - 2017-09-19
, performed the analysis. He was not called to testify, since he was on vacation. On appeal, Warrington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8078 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert J. Turicik
of intoxicants on Turicik's breath. She also noted that he had red, glassy eyes and that his speech was slurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10003 - 2005-03-31
of intoxicants on Turicik's breath. She also noted that he had red, glassy eyes and that his speech was slurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10003 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Essex Insurance Company v. James Manley
erred in denying his motion for summary judgment. He contends that Essex’s summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3375 - 2017-09-19
erred in denying his motion for summary judgment. He contends that Essex’s summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3375 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the colloquy; he was also required to allege—in his motion, not his brief—that he failed to understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123832 - 2017-09-21
in the colloquy; he was also required to allege—in his motion, not his brief—that he failed to understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123832 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Pearson waived his Miranda rights and told officers that he would confess only if he and Simmons were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540149 - 2022-07-06
that Pearson waived his Miranda rights and told officers that he would confess only if he and Simmons were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540149 - 2022-07-06
COURT OF APPEALS
$33,297.78 attorney’s fees. He argues: (1) the trial court erroneously concluded that issue preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29416 - 2007-06-18
$33,297.78 attorney’s fees. He argues: (1) the trial court erroneously concluded that issue preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29416 - 2007-06-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
trial must be held within fourteen days of demand). He argues that the trial court erred in applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36121 - 2014-09-15
trial must be held within fourteen days of demand). He argues that the trial court erred in applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36121 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his claim that a new factor warrants modification of his life sentence. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191298 - 2017-09-21
denying his claim that a new factor warrants modification of his life sentence. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191298 - 2017-09-21
State v. James J. Kempinski
(by contact and intercourse) of a fifteen year old. He entered guilty pleas in January 1999 to two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2416 - 2005-03-31
(by contact and intercourse) of a fifteen year old. He entered guilty pleas in January 1999 to two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2416 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. §§ 943.32(2), 939.32, 939.05 (2011-12).[1] He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110255 - 2014-04-14
. §§ 943.32(2), 939.32, 939.05 (2011-12).[1] He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110255 - 2014-04-14