Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22451 - 22460 of 76641 for search which.

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
of disorderly conduct, each with a domestic abuse surcharge. Thornton proceeded to a jury trial, at which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923140 - 2025-03-05

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gary A. Miller
conclude that the costs of the proceeding, which are $5486.86, as of July 21, 2005, should be assessed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20065 - 2005-10-24

[PDF] John A. Lashua v. Jodi L. Hansen-Lashua
are to be resolved by applying the factors in the change of placement No. 2004AP177 4 statute, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17694 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
exercised its discretion by imposing the maximum sentence, which he contends was excessive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208387 - 2018-02-13

John A. Lashua v. Jodi L. Hansen-Lashua
statute, which in turn refers to the factors for making the initial determination of placement. Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17694 - 2005-04-13

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
commission rates from American Family had significantly decreased over the past year, which he claims would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27430 - 2006-12-13

COURT OF APPEALS
in the amount of $2,500 cash, which Jackson was unable to post. In Portage County Case No. 2010CF260, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93172 - 2013-02-20

CA Blank Order
testified that Adams scored 33 out of 40 on the Hare Psychopathy Checklist, which is considered a very high
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102592 - 2013-09-30

State v. Jeffrey S. Amerson
that the testimony was admissible under ยง 908.03(5), Stats., which provides that a witness can testify about a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12081 - 2005-03-31

County of Clark v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
a disciplinary hearing before the Clark County Grievance Committee for violating department regulations, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13631 - 2005-03-31