Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22461 - 22470 of 68771 for did.
Search results 22461 - 22470 of 68771 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, did not file his report until September 5, 2023, one day before the final hearing. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913923 - 2025-02-11
, did not file his report until September 5, 2023, one day before the final hearing. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913923 - 2025-02-11
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - March 2016
that the procedural change in § 973.198 did not violate the ex post facto clauses, and the Court of Appeals
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163220 - 2017-09-21
that the procedural change in § 973.198 did not violate the ex post facto clauses, and the Court of Appeals
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163220 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy D. Russ
called his interpreters to the stand, never called his trial attorney, and did not take the stand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20692 - 2017-09-21
called his interpreters to the stand, never called his trial attorney, and did not take the stand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20692 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
has indicated, she could’ve did differently, could’ve done better. She has certainly undergone more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=934263 - 2025-04-02
has indicated, she could’ve did differently, could’ve done better. She has certainly undergone more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=934263 - 2025-04-02
State v. Shirley J. Peters
with first-degree intentional homicide for shooting her husband, Marvin. Peters did not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3663 - 2005-03-31
with first-degree intentional homicide for shooting her husband, Marvin. Peters did not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3663 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that could include aggravating allegations. Grimes asserts that trial counsel did not review the PSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052508 - 2025-12-18
that could include aggravating allegations. Grimes asserts that trial counsel did not review the PSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052508 - 2025-12-18
State v. James A. Montgomery
this court to conclude that Montgomery did not meet his burden of proving the existence of the six additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12979 - 2005-03-31
this court to conclude that Montgomery did not meet his burden of proving the existence of the six additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12979 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 24, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of ...
for what my daddy did?” Howard stated that T.K. also told her that: (1) Reginald would put C.T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64622 - 2011-05-23
for what my daddy did?” Howard stated that T.K. also told her that: (1) Reginald would put C.T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64622 - 2011-05-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
did not have an obligation to pay Ross’s medical bills because they were separated at the time he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36410 - 2014-09-15
did not have an obligation to pay Ross’s medical bills because they were separated at the time he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36410 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence H. Ross
after receiving the Miranda warnings did not constitute an unambiguous and unequivocal invocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9218 - 2017-09-19
after receiving the Miranda warnings did not constitute an unambiguous and unequivocal invocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9218 - 2017-09-19