Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22461 - 22470 of 57695 for id.

State v. Harris D. Byers
interpretation is to ascertain and give effect to the legislature's intent. Id. at 406. In determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2273 - 2005-03-31

Cindy Brenengen v. Brian D. Brenengen
at their fair market value. See id. at 399, 501 N.W.2d at 920. Fair market value is, however, a definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14064 - 2005-03-31

Harrold J. McComas v. Loren Tallmadge
construction is to determine the intent of the testator or settlor. Id. at 215, 538 N.W.2d at 568. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13099 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Richard Weyenberg v. Rod Kolpien
by the instructions was a correct statement of the law, the trial court properly exercised its discretion. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13067 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Robert Kreckel v. Pieper Electric, Inc.
that the insurer was not prejudiced by the untimely notice.” Id., ¶43 (citation omitted). “Generally, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25931 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Randall K. Mataya
by the court of appeals. See id. at ___, 588 N.W.2d at 16. In O’Brien, the court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13671 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kevon D. Davidson
the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690. To prove prejudice, a defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6595 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶17, 347 Wis. 2d 142, 832 N.W.2d 491; see also id., ¶¶9-10, 26, 32- 33, 49 (circuit court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815791 - 2024-06-20

State v. Evans A. W.
unless those findings are clearly erroneous. Id. at 634. Whether trial counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3087 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
if there are alternate theories of the crime also present in the record. Id. at 507-08. ¶10 The trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49293 - 2010-04-26