Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22461 - 22470 of 63555 for records/1000.
Search results 22461 - 22470 of 63555 for records/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record. If there exists a reasonable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33862 - 2014-09-15
with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record. If there exists a reasonable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33862 - 2014-09-15
State v. David S. Rhodes
record occurred when the prosecutor, in the course of introducing another witness stated: The next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8436 - 2005-03-31
record occurred when the prosecutor, in the course of introducing another witness stated: The next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8436 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and possessed by the record owners of Lot 11 (Hebert/Frisch). The court further determined that “the Jacobitz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78507 - 2014-09-15
and possessed by the record owners of Lot 11 (Hebert/Frisch). The court further determined that “the Jacobitz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78507 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. This court has considered the no-merit report and independently reviewed the record. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207803 - 2018-01-26
. This court has considered the no-merit report and independently reviewed the record. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207803 - 2018-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are drawn from the record made before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558087 - 2022-08-23
. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are drawn from the record made before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558087 - 2022-08-23
[PDF]
State v. David S. Rhodes
reference to his prior record occurred when the prosecutor, in the course of introducing another witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8436 - 2017-09-19
reference to his prior record occurred when the prosecutor, in the course of introducing another witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8436 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark T. Smith
We cannot say on the record before us that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6931 - 2005-03-31
We cannot say on the record before us that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6931 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record. If there exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33862 - 2008-09-02
in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record. If there exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33862 - 2008-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
struck the newly discovered evidence from the record, noting its frustration with Edlebeck and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89797 - 2012-12-03
struck the newly discovered evidence from the record, noting its frustration with Edlebeck and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89797 - 2012-12-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.”); State v. Tobatto, 2016 WI App 28, ¶26, 368 Wis. 2d 300, 878 N.W.2d 701 (“The record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896652 - 2025-01-02
.”); State v. Tobatto, 2016 WI App 28, ¶26, 368 Wis. 2d 300, 878 N.W.2d 701 (“The record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896652 - 2025-01-02