Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22471 - 22480 of 57365 for id.
Search results 22471 - 22480 of 57365 for id.
[PDF]
WI APP 85
in opposition. See id. at 567. To defeat the motion for summary judgment, the opposing party must set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32637 - 2014-09-15
in opposition. See id. at 567. To defeat the motion for summary judgment, the opposing party must set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32637 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert Miesen v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Transportation
and glean the record in extenso to find facts" supporting Miesen's argument. See id. Miesen's few
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14708 - 2017-09-21
and glean the record in extenso to find facts" supporting Miesen's argument. See id. Miesen's few
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14708 - 2017-09-21
State v. Matthew Tyler
not address both components of this inquiry if the defendant does not make a sufficient showing on one. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5702 - 2005-03-31
not address both components of this inquiry if the defendant does not make a sufficient showing on one. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5702 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel R. Parsley
and rationally considered by the jury was sufficient to prove a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5608 - 2005-03-31
and rationally considered by the jury was sufficient to prove a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5608 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an objective standard of reasonableness.” See id. at 688. In evaluating the alleged deficiency, a reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231334 - 2019-01-02
an objective standard of reasonableness.” See id. at 688. In evaluating the alleged deficiency, a reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231334 - 2019-01-02
[PDF]
State v. Anthony T. Hicks
all the circumstances. Id. at 688. A defendant must overcome the presumption that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8058 - 2017-09-19
all the circumstances. Id. at 688. A defendant must overcome the presumption that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8058 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael Cruz
" guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Id. Trial counsel's representation must be equivalent to that which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7821 - 2017-09-19
" guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Id. Trial counsel's representation must be equivalent to that which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7821 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
injustice’ test requires a defendant to show ‘a serious flaw in the fundamental integrity of the plea.’” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50188 - 2010-05-24
injustice’ test requires a defendant to show ‘a serious flaw in the fundamental integrity of the plea.’” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50188 - 2010-05-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that failure to withdraw the plea amounts to a manifest injustice.4 See id.; State v. Thomas, 2000 WI 13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010211 - 2025-09-18
that failure to withdraw the plea amounts to a manifest injustice.4 See id.; State v. Thomas, 2000 WI 13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010211 - 2025-09-18
State v. Joshua Slagoski
be used against him at a capital sentencing proceeding.” Id. at 468. Any statements made by a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2690 - 2005-03-31
be used against him at a capital sentencing proceeding.” Id. at 468. Any statements made by a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2690 - 2005-03-31