Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22481 - 22490 of 97641 for court records search online.
Search results 22481 - 22490 of 97641 for court records search online.
Mabel A.O. v. Conservatorship of Mabel A.O.
to an allegedly illegal placement. “[W]e decline to embark on our own search of the record, unguided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15169 - 2005-03-31
to an allegedly illegal placement. “[W]e decline to embark on our own search of the record, unguided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15169 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 9, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56493 - 2010-11-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 9, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56493 - 2010-11-08
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 2, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28836 - 2007-05-01
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 2, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28836 - 2007-05-01
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 28, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113091 - 2014-05-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 28, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113091 - 2014-05-27
COURT OF APPEALS
complied with Wis. Stat. § 802.05(4). It is apparent from the record that the court reviewed Altman’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105426 - 2013-12-09
complied with Wis. Stat. § 802.05(4). It is apparent from the record that the court reviewed Altman’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105426 - 2013-12-09
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 28, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30075 - 2007-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 28, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30075 - 2007-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 14, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62850 - 2011-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 14, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62850 - 2011-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS
decision was both “reasonable and supported by substantial evidence in the record.” The circuit court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30555 - 2007-10-09
decision was both “reasonable and supported by substantial evidence in the record.” The circuit court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30555 - 2007-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
court is required to demonstrate on the record a proper exercise of discretion when imposing a DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64234 - 2011-05-16
court is required to demonstrate on the record a proper exercise of discretion when imposing a DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64234 - 2011-05-16
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 24, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32530 - 2008-04-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 24, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32530 - 2008-04-23