Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22491 - 22500 of 57351 for id.

COURT OF APPEALS
of professionally competent assistance.” Id., 466 U.S. at 690. To prove prejudice, a defendant must demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64979 - 2011-05-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of patch located in Moreland’s apartment, that error was not prejudicial. See id. at 694 (trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88859 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Patricia S. Magyar v. Wisconsin Health Care Liability Insurance Plan
to insure his interest in a farm combine. Id. at 655. The insurer failed to notify Sausen that it would
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17455 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
property. See id.; WIS. STAT. § 767.61(2)(a). The determination of whether property is divisible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219941 - 2018-09-27

[PDF] State v. Thomas J.W.
will be appointed for him prior to any questioning if he so desires. Id. at 479. The Miranda Court went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12110 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Daren E. Maron
did not make probation a sentence. Id. at 114, 216 N.W.2d at 45. In reaching this conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12232 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Somkhith Neuaone
of sentencing.” Id. at 126. While Neuaone argues that “withholding information is certainly different from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18913 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Anthony M. Cotton
that is needed is a believable or plausible account of the defendant’s commission of a felony. Id. at 398
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5836 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Browning-Ferris Industries of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
of a statute in certain situations. Id. at 823. We give great weight when the following conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3267 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). “Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. “[T]he purpose of statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265112 - 2020-06-23