Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22491 - 22500 of 58506 for speedy trial.

CA Blank Order
and as an habitual criminal. By counsel, Hill filed a postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98555 - 2013-06-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
an order that denied his postconviction motion for a new trial based upon a claim of newly discovered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212064 - 2018-04-27

[PDF] State v. David Buck
of trial counsel. Buck argues that his counsel was ineffective because he did not convince Buck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15453 - 2017-09-21

Randy Duncan v. Kenneth Gillingham
. The trial court allowed the County’s subrogation claim despite its failure to timely appear in the action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11008 - 2005-03-31

L'Wanda Warrendorf v. Donald Osborne
answered the complaint against her and appeared at trial. After a “significant discussion” was held off
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12934 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Andrew J.N. v. Wendy L.D.
the trial court’s order in 1992. The Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld our decision in 1993. Meanwhile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16148 - 2017-09-21

[MS WORD] SC-6020V: Pre-Judgment: Basic Steps for Handling a Small Claims Case for Recovery of Money
, the court will schedule a trial/hearing. Before the trial/hearing, you may contact the other party to try
/formdisplay/SC-6020V_instructions.doc?formNumber=SC-6020V&formType=Instructions&formatId=1&language=en - 2020-11-13

State v. Romero D. Wilson
., Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. The State appeals from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16225 - 2005-03-31

State v. William R.S.
on the first and second issues, but § 752.35, Stats., empowers this court to grant a new trial because the real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9507 - 2005-03-31

Teresa Greene-Ashley v. Bruce Greene
] At the contempt hearing, the trial court found Bruce in contempt of court for these failures. It ordered Bruce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12400 - 2015-07-06