Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2251 - 2260 of 17421 for Cost.
Search results 2251 - 2260 of 17421 for Cost.
[PDF]
NOTICE
estimated it would cost $151,899.39 to repair the heavily damaged unit, and $15,818.37 for the smoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52935 - 2014-09-15
estimated it would cost $151,899.39 to repair the heavily damaged unit, and $15,818.37 for the smoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52935 - 2014-09-15
Sally A. Gonnering v. David L. Gonnering
the threshold [number of days] and assumes all variable child care costs in proportion to the number of days he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8489 - 2005-03-31
the threshold [number of days] and assumes all variable child care costs in proportion to the number of days he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8489 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Thomas M. Teubel v. Prime Development, Inc.
. and Robert No. 01-1098 2 B. Clemen, and a judgment awarding Clemen $11,618.40 in costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3879 - 2017-09-20
. and Robert No. 01-1098 2 B. Clemen, and a judgment awarding Clemen $11,618.40 in costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3879 - 2017-09-20
Frontsheet
that a portion of the costs of the proceeding, $1,403.04, should be assessed against Attorney Schreier. ¶3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96066 - 2013-04-29
that a portion of the costs of the proceeding, $1,403.04, should be assessed against Attorney Schreier. ¶3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96066 - 2013-04-29
[PDF]
Frontsheet
restitution and the costs of this proceeding. ¶2 Because no appeal has been filed, we review the referee's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203656 - 2017-11-28
restitution and the costs of this proceeding. ¶2 Because no appeal has been filed, we review the referee's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203656 - 2017-11-28
[PDF]
Sally A. Gonnering v. David L. Gonnering
child care beyond the threshold [number of days] and assumes all variable child care costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8489 - 2017-09-19
child care beyond the threshold [number of days] and assumes all variable child care costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8489 - 2017-09-19
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. Backes
Attorney Backes' objection, he should be required to pay the costs of the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20018 - 2010-02-01
Attorney Backes' objection, he should be required to pay the costs of the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20018 - 2010-02-01
Jacquie Hur v. Laverne Holler
a decision and order awarding the respondents $16,146.87 in costs and attorney fees after Hur's case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10168 - 2005-03-31
a decision and order awarding the respondents $16,146.87 in costs and attorney fees after Hur's case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10168 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
, the imposition of costs, and restitution to the Wisconsin Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (the Fund
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82875 - 2005-04-22
, the imposition of costs, and restitution to the Wisconsin Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (the Fund
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82875 - 2005-04-22
[PDF]
John Trenhaile v. J.H. Findorff & Son, Inc.
for costs and attorney’s fees, and unjust enrichment. They claim that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5834 - 2017-09-19
for costs and attorney’s fees, and unjust enrichment. They claim that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5834 - 2017-09-19