Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2251 - 2260 of 16451 for commenting.
Search results 2251 - 2260 of 16451 for commenting.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
convictions and considered comments from the defendant and her counsel regarding those prior convictions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973611 - 2025-06-26
convictions and considered comments from the defendant and her counsel regarding those prior convictions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973611 - 2025-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is that the statements “must be relevant to the sentence.” Id. Draeger’s comments were relevant to the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195919 - 2017-09-21
is that the statements “must be relevant to the sentence.” Id. Draeger’s comments were relevant to the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195919 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dan E. Holman
preaching and he cannot be held responsible simply because Packard happened to hear his comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4341 - 2017-09-19
preaching and he cannot be held responsible simply because Packard happened to hear his comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4341 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Rule Order
public comment on both rule matters. The time allotted for public comment may be limited. Therefore
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148093 - 2017-10-16
public comment on both rule matters. The time allotted for public comment may be limited. Therefore
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148093 - 2017-10-16
Eugene Cherry v. Donald Gudmanson
). In this case, the record does not show that Cherry denied making the Oklahoma comment, although his statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15925 - 2005-03-31
). In this case, the record does not show that Cherry denied making the Oklahoma comment, although his statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15925 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rule Order
public comment on both rule matters. The time allotted for public comment may be limited. Therefore
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148093 - 2017-10-16
public comment on both rule matters. The time allotted for public comment may be limited. Therefore
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148093 - 2017-10-16
[PDF]
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
pilot project following receipt of public comment and public hearing), as amended by S. Ct. Order 16
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256657 - 2020-03-13
pilot project following receipt of public comment and public hearing), as amended by S. Ct. Order 16
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256657 - 2020-03-13
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth A. Roberts
of prejudice; (3) the prosecution improperly commented on Roberts’ silence during the prosecution’s closing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15931 - 2017-09-21
of prejudice; (3) the prosecution improperly commented on Roberts’ silence during the prosecution’s closing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15931 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Rule Order
and commented on the petition. The court also received and considered a number of written comments
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144097 - 2017-09-21
and commented on the petition. The court also received and considered a number of written comments
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144097 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Eugene Cherry v. Donald Gudmanson
the Oklahoma comment, although his statement to the committee challenged other parts of the conduct report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15925 - 2017-09-21
the Oklahoma comment, although his statement to the committee challenged other parts of the conduct report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15925 - 2017-09-21