Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2251 - 2260 of 30059 for de.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law for de novo review. Id. A. Circuit Court’s Factual Finding That NDC Rejected The $90,500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156433 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of postconviction counsel claim is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91540 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Kathy Hoffman v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
decision de novo because this case is clearly one of first impression for WERC and WERC has no special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2621 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Michael Slinker
present questions of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶18. ¶6 A presumption of vindictiveness arises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6679 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. Wild Goose Inn, Inc.
of a contract is a question of law that we review de novo. Edwards v. Petrone, 160 Wis.2d 255, 258, 465 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7909 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 215
the marital estate to work a de facto splitting of those assets where there is no hardship. Jeffrey further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26454 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before Kloppenburg, P.J., Blanchard, and Nashold, JJ. Per
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=720184 - 2023-10-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
constitute reasonable suspicion is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶9 “The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209161 - 2018-03-06

COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court applied the correct burden of proof. This presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53769 - 2010-08-25

Harnischfeger Corporation v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
is a question of law which courts decide de novo. See Kania v. Airborne Freight Corp., 99 Wis. 2d 746, 758, 300
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16860 - 2008-09-01