Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2251 - 2260 of 68468 for did.
Search results 2251 - 2260 of 68468 for did.
State v. Andre L. Avery
then ran to their car and drove away. Roby testified that he did not see at whom Andre Avery was shooting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25530 - 2006-06-19
then ran to their car and drove away. Roby testified that he did not see at whom Andre Avery was shooting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25530 - 2006-06-19
State v. Frank M. Ruszkiewicz
the victim. ¶3 Although the trial court did not conduct a formal “wavier/competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15485 - 2005-03-31
the victim. ¶3 Although the trial court did not conduct a formal “wavier/competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15485 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Andre L. Avery
that he did not see at whom Andre Avery was shooting, but when they got into the car, Leonard Avery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25530 - 2017-09-21
that he did not see at whom Andre Avery was shooting, but when they got into the car, Leonard Avery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25530 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that she told her mom about the sexual assaults, but her mom did not initially believe her. Alice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967584 - 2025-06-10
that she told her mom about the sexual assaults, but her mom did not initially believe her. Alice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967584 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
equipment that the District claimed did not satisfy the agreed-upon specifications. After Evergreen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751866 - 2024-01-18
equipment that the District claimed did not satisfy the agreed-upon specifications. After Evergreen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751866 - 2024-01-18
State v. Michael D. Morris
did not comply with Wis. Stat. § 971.23(1) (1999-2000).[1] Section 971.23(1) specifies which evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4566 - 2005-03-31
did not comply with Wis. Stat. § 971.23(1) (1999-2000).[1] Section 971.23(1) specifies which evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4566 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
because it did not establish Singh’s understanding of the elements of the charges, and Singh did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105521 - 2013-12-09
because it did not establish Singh’s understanding of the elements of the charges, and Singh did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105521 - 2013-12-09
[PDF]
State v. John A. Gatt
on the interstate, and he began to follow it. As he did so, he received another report over the CB giving him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13938 - 2014-09-15
on the interstate, and he began to follow it. As he did so, he received another report over the CB giving him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13938 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
could not consider the violations because the State did not prove he committed them. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57826 - 2010-12-13
could not consider the violations because the State did not prove he committed them. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57826 - 2010-12-13
State v. Mitchel P.
convinces us, however, that the sentencing court did not impose the impossible burden asserted by Mitchel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19537 - 2005-09-06
convinces us, however, that the sentencing court did not impose the impossible burden asserted by Mitchel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19537 - 2005-09-06