Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2251 - 2260 of 82604 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 2251 - 2260 of 82604 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has entered the following opinion and order: 2016AP768-NM 2016AP769-NM 2016AP770-NM
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170347 - 2017-09-21
has entered the following opinion and order: 2016AP768-NM 2016AP769-NM 2016AP770-NM
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170347 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jon M. Schirmang
Schirmang had unreasonably refused to submit to testing and ordered a three-year license revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11417 - 2005-03-31
Schirmang had unreasonably refused to submit to testing and ordered a three-year license revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11417 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jon M. Schirmang
Schirmang had unreasonably refused to submit to testing and ordered a three-year license revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11108 - 2005-03-31
Schirmang had unreasonably refused to submit to testing and ordered a three-year license revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11108 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
legal custody and primary placement. The court ordered Grube to pay monthly child support of $186.93
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88872 - 2012-11-05
legal custody and primary placement. The court ordered Grube to pay monthly child support of $186.93
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88872 - 2012-11-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ordered Grube to pay monthly child support of $186.93, based upon imputed minimum wage at thirty-five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88872 - 2014-09-15
ordered Grube to pay monthly child support of $186.93, based upon imputed minimum wage at thirty-five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88872 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, specifically 21 U.S.C. § 360k(a) (2000),[3] preempted the negligence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35592 - 2009-02-16
to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, specifically 21 U.S.C. § 360k(a) (2000),[3] preempted the negligence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35592 - 2009-02-16
[PDF]
WI 16
of the 1976 Medical Device Amendments to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, specifically 21 U.S.C
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35592 - 2014-09-15
of the 1976 Medical Device Amendments to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, specifically 21 U.S.C
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35592 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in question. A trace evidence analyst from the State Crime Laboratory testified that he tested samples
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=582076 - 2022-10-25
in question. A trace evidence analyst from the State Crime Laboratory testified that he tested samples
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=582076 - 2022-10-25
COURT OF APPEALS
biological father and Lavontae’s known biological father. The trial court entered orders terminating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120102 - 2014-08-20
biological father and Lavontae’s known biological father. The trial court entered orders terminating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120102 - 2014-08-20
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
for opinions & dispositional orders Opinions scheduled for release Dispositional tables Oral argument schedule
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=137&year=2009
for opinions & dispositional orders Opinions scheduled for release Dispositional tables Oral argument schedule
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=137&year=2009