Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22501 - 22510 of 69007 for had.
Search results 22501 - 22510 of 69007 for had.
State v. Willie S. Gray, Jr.
, the State questioned Latasha about two additional robberies that she and Carmella had committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14056 - 2005-03-31
, the State questioned Latasha about two additional robberies that she and Carmella had committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14056 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sandy J. Claude
submit to a blood test, had decided, based on the policy of his department which so dictated, that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6514 - 2005-03-31
submit to a blood test, had decided, based on the policy of his department which so dictated, that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6514 - 2005-03-31
Town of Mount Pleasant v. Gerald A. Hoornstra
. The order, however, noted that both appeals had to be in compliance with statutory requirements.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15195 - 2005-03-31
. The order, however, noted that both appeals had to be in compliance with statutory requirements.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15195 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
jeopardy because he had already been convicted for that stalking conduct. We reject his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143517 - 2017-09-21
jeopardy because he had already been convicted for that stalking conduct. We reject his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143517 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in which the Wetzels’ son, James, had an ownership interest—executed a promissory note in favor of Belcorp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110111 - 2014-04-14
in which the Wetzels’ son, James, had an ownership interest—executed a promissory note in favor of Belcorp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110111 - 2014-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
jeopardy because he had already been convicted for that stalking conduct. We reject his claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143517 - 2015-06-30
jeopardy because he had already been convicted for that stalking conduct. We reject his claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143517 - 2015-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
. This court concludes that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest Kratochwill and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92779 - 2013-02-13
. This court concludes that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest Kratochwill and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92779 - 2013-02-13
[PDF]
State v. Karen A.O.
whether the child had been previously adjudicated to be a child in need of protection or services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9931 - 2017-09-19
whether the child had been previously adjudicated to be a child in need of protection or services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9931 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the medical malpractice claim because the statute of limitations had passed, but denied Luther’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32773 - 2014-09-15
on the medical malpractice claim because the statute of limitations had passed, but denied Luther’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32773 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
–828, 416 N.W.2d 627, 630 (Ct. App. 1987), in which he acknowledged that his lawyer had explained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102472 - 2017-09-21
–828, 416 N.W.2d 627, 630 (Ct. App. 1987), in which he acknowledged that his lawyer had explained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102472 - 2017-09-21