Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22501 - 22510 of 37988 for ph d.
Search results 22501 - 22510 of 37988 for ph d.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to make a statement or file charges against [Martinez] as he ha[d] harmed her so many times in the past
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181349 - 2017-09-21
to make a statement or file charges against [Martinez] as he ha[d] harmed her so many times in the past
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181349 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the record does not reflect the court considered paragraphs (b), (c), (d) and (e) at the dispositional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191364 - 2017-09-21
the record does not reflect the court considered paragraphs (b), (c), (d) and (e) at the dispositional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191364 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Earl L. Miller
properly refused to instruct the jury on Mirkovich’s immunity. D. Prior Consistent Statements ¶35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14291 - 2014-09-15
properly refused to instruct the jury on Mirkovich’s immunity. D. Prior Consistent Statements ¶35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14291 - 2014-09-15
Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
. Wisconsin Stat. § 5.01(4)(d) directs that when the voting results in a tie, the referendum has been defeated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16599 - 2005-03-31
. Wisconsin Stat. § 5.01(4)(d) directs that when the voting results in a tie, the referendum has been defeated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16599 - 2005-03-31
State v. David C. Polashek
"); Brooks v. Veterans Admin., 773 F. Supp. 1483, 1485 n.1 (D. Kan. 1991) (stating that when the recipient
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16394 - 2005-03-31
"); Brooks v. Veterans Admin., 773 F. Supp. 1483, 1485 n.1 (D. Kan. 1991) (stating that when the recipient
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16394 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 80
. No. 2011AP1158(D) ¶32 REILLY, J. (dissenting). This case is not about rain that fell in June 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83925 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2011AP1158(D) ¶32 REILLY, J. (dissenting). This case is not about rain that fell in June 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83925 - 2014-09-15
William Pangman v.
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-0039-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17079 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-0039-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17079 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
)(a), 939.50(3)(d). Sterling asserts that “[a] reasonable person would conclude that the judge had made up his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49634 - 2010-05-03
)(a), 939.50(3)(d). Sterling asserts that “[a] reasonable person would conclude that the judge had made up his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49634 - 2010-05-03
COURT OF APPEALS
in reliance on a survey.” In November 1969, the Orcutts received payment from Blum’s father, Ralph D. Blum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84993 - 2012-07-18
in reliance on a survey.” In November 1969, the Orcutts received payment from Blum’s father, Ralph D. Blum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84993 - 2012-07-18
COURT OF APPEALS
- Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. Sandra Roney d/b/a Roney Images
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35199 - 2009-01-12
- Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. Sandra Roney d/b/a Roney Images
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35199 - 2009-01-12