Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22501 - 22510 of 58312 for speedy trial.
Search results 22501 - 22510 of 58312 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
in lieu of his request to withdraw his plea, and in March 2006 after a jury trial following Rose’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33344 - 2008-07-15
in lieu of his request to withdraw his plea, and in March 2006 after a jury trial following Rose’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33344 - 2008-07-15
City of Green Bay v. Donald J. Schleis
denying his motion for a new trial. He argues that (1) the circuit court erroneously instructed the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16135 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion for a new trial. He argues that (1) the circuit court erroneously instructed the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16135 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Andre D. Mitchell
) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his confession, and (2) his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12705 - 2017-09-21
) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his confession, and (2) his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12705 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Green Bay v. Donald J. Schleis
appeals the order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues that (1) the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16135 - 2017-09-21
appeals the order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues that (1) the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16135 - 2017-09-21
Gerald G. Geyso v. Richard Daly
than the Dalys’ main driveway. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the Geysos; however, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7384 - 2005-03-31
than the Dalys’ main driveway. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the Geysos; however, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7384 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Bruce Martindale v. Bruce A. Ripp
action. He argues that he is entitled to a new trial because of the trial court’s erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15239 - 2017-09-21
action. He argues that he is entitled to a new trial because of the trial court’s erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15239 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, pro se, appeals trial court orders denying his motions for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157478 - 2017-09-21
, pro se, appeals trial court orders denying his motions for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157478 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶7 In the meantime, the trial court denied Dr. Bartel’s summary judgment motion and granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90059 - 2014-09-15
. ¶7 In the meantime, the trial court denied Dr. Bartel’s summary judgment motion and granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90059 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance from his trial lawyer because his lawyer should have called a third-party eyewitness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115155 - 2014-06-23
ineffective assistance from his trial lawyer because his lawyer should have called a third-party eyewitness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115155 - 2014-06-23
Nicholas S. Schreiner v. Up North Plastics, Inc.
., Westfield Insurance Co., and Henry Huffcutt Co., Inc., appeal a summary judgment of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25491 - 2006-07-25
., Westfield Insurance Co., and Henry Huffcutt Co., Inc., appeal a summary judgment of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25491 - 2006-07-25