Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22521 - 22530 of 59355 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 22521 - 22530 of 59355 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
guilty. He moved for a new trial, claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64079 - 2014-09-15
guilty. He moved for a new trial, claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64079 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
exercise of discretion. See id. I. Double Jeopardy/Multiplicity Ireland’s first claim of manifest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669025 - 2023-06-20
exercise of discretion. See id. I. Double Jeopardy/Multiplicity Ireland’s first claim of manifest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669025 - 2023-06-20
Donald Geller v. Gerald Niedert
finding that their claim had no merit, or that they exercised bad faith in violating the order compelling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9991 - 2005-03-31
finding that their claim had no merit, or that they exercised bad faith in violating the order compelling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9991 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. A jury found him guilty. He moved for a new trial, claiming ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64079 - 2011-05-17
motion. A jury found him guilty. He moved for a new trial, claiming ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64079 - 2011-05-17
COURT OF APPEALS
for an order compelling discovery, claiming Merkel had refused to respond to his discovery requests. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54225 - 2010-09-08
for an order compelling discovery, claiming Merkel had refused to respond to his discovery requests. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54225 - 2010-09-08
State v. Floyd L. Marlow
. §§ 940.02(1), 939.63, 939.05 (1999–2000).[1] Marlow claims that the evidence was insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6825 - 2005-03-31
. §§ 940.02(1), 939.63, 939.05 (1999–2000).[1] Marlow claims that the evidence was insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6825 - 2005-03-31
State v. George H. Tutor
not have his reading glasses and that he could not read the two smudged tags he had. He claimed that only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3677 - 2005-03-31
not have his reading glasses and that he could not read the two smudged tags he had. He claimed that only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3677 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Brueser would claim that when the police encountered her after she left Kelly’s apartment building
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138312 - 2017-09-21
, Brueser would claim that when the police encountered her after she left Kelly’s apartment building
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138312 - 2017-09-21
Neil H. Caflisch v. Richard W. Cross
his claims for contract additions under oral modification, quantum meruit or unjust enrichment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10363 - 2005-03-31
his claims for contract additions under oral modification, quantum meruit or unjust enrichment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10363 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
plea and at sentencing. He also claims his sentence is an erroneous exercise of discretion. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34840 - 2008-12-09
plea and at sentencing. He also claims his sentence is an erroneous exercise of discretion. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34840 - 2008-12-09