Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22551 - 22560 of 86247 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu 2 Baja Ringan Berampu Dairi.
Search results 22551 - 22560 of 86247 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu 2 Baja Ringan Berampu Dairi.
City of West Allis v. Robert C. Braun
court judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 The civil forfeiture at issue arose out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7127 - 2005-03-31
court judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 The civil forfeiture at issue arose out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7127 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Tommy Smith, Jr. v. Daren Swenson
., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Nos. 2004AP2518 2004AP2519 2 APPEAL from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18681 - 2017-09-21
., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Nos. 2004AP2518 2004AP2519 2 APPEAL from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18681 - 2017-09-21
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Samantha E.
is an illegal drug user; (2) Samantha has resided in eighteen different residences between December 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14126 - 2005-03-31
is an illegal drug user; (2) Samantha has resided in eighteen different residences between December 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14126 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Horicon v. Karl K. Albert
by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), STATS. No. 99-0729 99-0730 2 judgments because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15274 - 2017-09-21
by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), STATS. No. 99-0729 99-0730 2 judgments because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15274 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2020AP840 2 On March 12, 2014, the DOT informed Schottler that it had received information “caus
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379748 - 2021-06-22
. No. 2020AP840 2 On March 12, 2014, the DOT informed Schottler that it had received information “caus
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379748 - 2021-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
supervision, we affirm. ¶2 Metcalfe was convicted of forgery/uttering as a party to a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31768 - 2008-02-11
supervision, we affirm. ¶2 Metcalfe was convicted of forgery/uttering as a party to a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31768 - 2008-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
either already been litigated or are procedurally barred. The order is therefore affirmed. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93884 - 2013-03-11
either already been litigated or are procedurally barred. The order is therefore affirmed. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93884 - 2013-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
; and (2) that the circuit court lacked authority to order restitution. We conclude that the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30637 - 2007-10-17
; and (2) that the circuit court lacked authority to order restitution. We conclude that the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30637 - 2007-10-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP1559-CR 2 In 2005, this court affirmed Brown’s convictions for two counts of delivering
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610223 - 2023-01-18
. No. 2021AP1559-CR 2 In 2005, this court affirmed Brown’s convictions for two counts of delivering
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610223 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Clay F. Teasdale
proceeding. 04-0322-D 2 ¶2 We determine that the seriousness of Attorney Teasdale's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16823 - 2017-09-21
proceeding. 04-0322-D 2 ¶2 We determine that the seriousness of Attorney Teasdale's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16823 - 2017-09-21