Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22551 - 22560 of 41685 for jury duty/1000.

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Anne Kathleen Reilly
condition that substantially prevents her from performing the duties of an attorney to acceptable
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24689 - 2006-04-02

[PDF] May a judge purchase common stock of a Wisconsin corporation that could be involved in future litigation before the court in which the judge serves?
the corporation are infrequent. In such cases, the judge recognizes the duty to recuse, and other judges from
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] 03-04 Amendment of SCR 20:1.5(b) - Fees; Creation of SCR 20:1.5(e) - Written Communication on Fees; Amendment of SCR 31.02 - CLE Credits for Ethics (Petition returned without action to Fee Arbitration Study Committee)
) the threshold level of anticipated fees that should trigger the lawyer's increased duties, and 5
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948 - 2017-09-20

03-04 Amendment of SCR 20:1.5(b) - Fees; Creation of SCR 20:1.5(e) - Written Communication on Fees; Amendment of SCR 31.02 - CLE Credits for Ethics (Petition returned without action to Fee Arbitration Study Committee)
) the threshold level of anticipated fees that should trigger the lawyer's increased duties, and 5) the continuing
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=948 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lorraine Schwartz v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
, the commission had a duty to deny compensation. Beem v. Industrial Comm'n, 244 Wis. 334, 337, 12 N.W.2d 42, 43
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8559 - 2017-09-19

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Robert K. Kuhnmuench
that Robert K. Kuhnmuench comply with the provision s of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16367 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
obligation to perform all judicial duties fairly and impartially. See S. Ct. Order 13-14, 2014 WI 49
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185112 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] 03-04 Amendment of SCR 20:1.5(b) - Fees; Creation of SCR 20:1.5(e) - Written Communication on Fees; Amendment of SCR 31.02 - CLE Credits for Ethics (Petition returned without action to Fee Arbitration Study Committee)
) the threshold level of anticipated fees that should trigger the lawyer's increased duties, and 5
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1120 - 2017-09-19

Lorraine Schwartz v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
had a duty to deny compensation. Beem v. Industrial Comm'n, 244 Wis. 334, 337, 12 N.W.2d 42, 43 (1943
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8559 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Fred J. Perri v. Diocese of La Crosse
is ministerial or ecclesiastical: As a general rule, if the employee's primary duties consist of teaching
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8583 - 2017-09-19