Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22551 - 22560 of 50100 for our.
Search results 22551 - 22560 of 50100 for our.
State v. Reginald J. Baskin
support the decision not to reduce the presumptive minimum sentence. Upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12185 - 2005-03-31
support the decision not to reduce the presumptive minimum sentence. Upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12185 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
instruction. ¶6 Our confidence in this method of reconstruction is particularly high under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265330 - 2020-07-28
instruction. ¶6 Our confidence in this method of reconstruction is particularly high under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265330 - 2020-07-28
Mark W. P. v. Patrick Stangl
to its exercise of jurisdiction. We affirm the trial court’s order on the grounds stated above. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13516 - 2005-03-31
to its exercise of jurisdiction. We affirm the trial court’s order on the grounds stated above. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13516 - 2005-03-31
State v. Alfred J. Spears
to preserve the issue for our review, we see no reversible error. First, there is no indication that Spears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13778 - 2005-03-31
to preserve the issue for our review, we see no reversible error. First, there is no indication that Spears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13778 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, that there is no arguable merit to any of them. Our review of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243747 - 2019-07-17
, that there is no arguable merit to any of them. Our review of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243747 - 2019-07-17
Curt Wenzel v. Kristy Peters
Our decision to reverse and remand for further proceedings makes it unnecessary to address the Wenzels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4331 - 2005-03-31
Our decision to reverse and remand for further proceedings makes it unnecessary to address the Wenzels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4331 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
will not discuss them further. Our review of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal.4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1019346 - 2025-10-08
will not discuss them further. Our review of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal.4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1019346 - 2025-10-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=520224 - 2022-05-12
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=520224 - 2022-05-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192311 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192311 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his motion for sentence modification. He alleges the existence of a new factor. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491608 - 2022-03-09
his motion for sentence modification. He alleges the existence of a new factor. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491608 - 2022-03-09