Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22551 - 22560 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 22551 - 22560 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
State v. Ronald H. Gilpin
not persuaded us that his counsel was ineffective, or that any claimed error in admitting evidence could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14263 - 2005-03-31
not persuaded us that his counsel was ineffective, or that any claimed error in admitting evidence could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14263 - 2005-03-31
Jerome J. Hein v. Thomas N. Frieberg
. The parties agree that Jerome’s total claim for injuries and damages is $87,500, and the policy limits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3120 - 2005-03-31
. The parties agree that Jerome’s total claim for injuries and damages is $87,500, and the policy limits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3120 - 2005-03-31
State v. Martin J. Applebee
and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that he is entitled to a new trial (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3349 - 2005-03-31
and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that he is entitled to a new trial (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3349 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jacqueline Dixson v. Wisconsin Health Organization Insurance Corporation
claim that the trial court erred when it found that Milwaukee County was entitled to summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13462 - 2017-09-21
claim that the trial court erred when it found that Milwaukee County was entitled to summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13462 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
WIS. STAT. §§940.01(1), 940.11(2) (2023-24).1 La Roche claims that her trial counsel were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994986 - 2025-08-13
WIS. STAT. §§940.01(1), 940.11(2) (2023-24).1 La Roche claims that her trial counsel were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994986 - 2025-08-13
State v. Thomas W. Jackson
in the original judgments. The orders also rejected Jackson’s claim for additional sentence credit. We modify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15466 - 2005-03-31
in the original judgments. The orders also rejected Jackson’s claim for additional sentence credit. We modify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15466 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Northern States Power Company
at all times. Accordingly, for Wisconsin tax purposes, Northern did not claim any tax benefits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11885 - 2005-03-31
at all times. Accordingly, for Wisconsin tax purposes, Northern did not claim any tax benefits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11885 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. George L. Jones
motion. Jones claims: (1) his statements should have been suppressed by the trial court because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16320 - 2017-09-21
motion. Jones claims: (1) his statements should have been suppressed by the trial court because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16320 - 2017-09-21
2008 WI APP 119
-compliant trial to which he is entitled because he can: (1) file a wage-claim action under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33057 - 2008-07-29
-compliant trial to which he is entitled because he can: (1) file a wage-claim action under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33057 - 2008-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 22, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
). Acuity claimed that it was entitled to subrogation from Partners because an Ironworks employee damaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27201 - 2006-11-21
). Acuity claimed that it was entitled to subrogation from Partners because an Ironworks employee damaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27201 - 2006-11-21