Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22561 - 22570 of 29827 for des.

[PDF] WI APP 20
of a statute and of a collective bargaining agreement de novo. State v. Jensen, 2010 WI 38, ¶8, 324 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106754 - 2017-09-21

State v. Deborah E.
subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862-63, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4681 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 29, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
to those facts de novo.” Id. (internal citations omitted). “Whether police conduct violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92112 - 2013-01-28

[PDF] Metropolitan Ventures, LLC v. GEA Associates
Whether the essential terms of a contract are definite presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6653 - 2017-09-20

State v. Steven R. Horton
review such legal questions de novo. See Winiarski v. Miicke, 186 Wis.2d 409, 412, 521 N.W.2d 162, 164
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7742 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
de novo.” Deminsky v. Arlington Plastics Mach., 2003 WI 15, ¶15, 259 Wis. 2d 587, 657 N.W.2d 411
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208059 - 2018-02-06

State v. Gregory N. Olson
involve the interpretation of a statute, which is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Setagord
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13544 - 2005-03-31

State v. Mervel L. Eagans, Jr.
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 101, 457 N.W.2d 299, 311 (1990). The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12954 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116190 - 2017-09-21

State v. Scott Edward Ziegler
, including restitution, presents a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7417 - 2005-05-09