Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22561 - 22570 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] State v. Gwyn J. Johnson
, such as the meaning of “security” within ch. 551, are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Sveum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3877 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
a deficiency or amount to prejudice are determinations we review de novo. Id. ¶11 A postconviction Machner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36376 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Reginald Green
in Wisconsin requiring this court to construe § 943.28, STATS. Accordingly, our review is de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10482 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI APP 78
). Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 132. ¶15 WISCONSIN STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97268 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. John F. Giminski
, establishes a sufficient basis for the instruction presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3257 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo.” Waukesha County v. J.W.J., 2017 WI 57, ¶15, 375 Wis. 2d 542, 895 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789717 - 2024-04-16

[PDF] State v. Michael A. Martin
-3131 5 law that we review de novo. State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 762, 482 N.W.2d 883
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7069 - 2017-09-20

George T. Stathus v. James H. Horst
, on which we express no opinion, it was certainly de minimis and not one requiring a new trial. 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2468 - 2005-03-31

Gary K. Smith v. General Casualty Insurance Company
a question of law, which we review de novo while benefiting from the analysis of the court of appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17411 - 2005-03-31

2009 WI APP 36
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court.” Kiss v. General Motors Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35446 - 2011-06-14