Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22571 - 22580 of 98574 for civil court case status online.
Search results 22571 - 22580 of 98574 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that it is contrary to the best interests of the juvenile or the public to hear the case, the court shall enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134447 - 2017-09-21
that it is contrary to the best interests of the juvenile or the public to hear the case, the court shall enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134447 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be undisclosed. The State presented the testimony of C.B., a case manager. M.S.H. also testified. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685119 - 2023-08-01
be undisclosed. The State presented the testimony of C.B., a case manager. M.S.H. also testified. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685119 - 2023-08-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 13, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180957 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 13, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180957 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case has spanned well over a decade. This appeal arises from a circuit court decision and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840099 - 2024-08-20
in this case has spanned well over a decade. This appeal arises from a circuit court decision and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840099 - 2024-08-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but in this case the court did not require the disclosure of lay witnesses. Here, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101638 - 2017-09-21
, but in this case the court did not require the disclosure of lay witnesses. Here, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101638 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the investigation of this case. The trial court reviewed the images on the disc, comparing them to descriptions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207696 - 2018-01-30
the investigation of this case. The trial court reviewed the images on the disc, comparing them to descriptions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207696 - 2018-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court granted the requested relief. ΒΆ5 After Nationstar entered the case, the parties litigated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138244 - 2017-09-21
. The circuit court granted the requested relief. ΒΆ5 After Nationstar entered the case, the parties litigated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138244 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 10, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255844 - 2020-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 10, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255844 - 2020-03-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. And, McMillan does not point to a comparable case in which a court found no reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181182 - 2017-09-21
. And, McMillan does not point to a comparable case in which a court found no reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181182 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 29, 2025 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989780 - 2025-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 29, 2025 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989780 - 2025-07-29