Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22571 - 22580 of 98406 for court records search online.
Search results 22571 - 22580 of 98406 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
) the record did not support the court’s determination; (2) the court failed to conduct the proper legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55525 - 2010-10-13
) the record did not support the court’s determination; (2) the court failed to conduct the proper legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55525 - 2010-10-13
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 12, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141618 - 2015-05-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 12, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141618 - 2015-05-11
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 25, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33118 - 2008-06-24
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 25, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33118 - 2008-06-24
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 17, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53250 - 2010-08-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 17, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53250 - 2010-08-16
COURT OF APPEALS
considering the issue of prejudice. The circuit court discussed the issue of prejudice on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74264 - 2011-11-22
considering the issue of prejudice. The circuit court discussed the issue of prejudice on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74264 - 2011-11-22
COURT OF APPEALS
to acknowledge that we had determined Wieczorek was lawfully seized. The record does not reflect that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101687 - 2013-09-09
to acknowledge that we had determined Wieczorek was lawfully seized. The record does not reflect that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101687 - 2013-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court did not make an express finding that the victim’s statements were inconsistent, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30565 - 2007-10-16
that the trial court did not make an express finding that the victim’s statements were inconsistent, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30565 - 2007-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 7, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83380 - 2012-06-06
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 7, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83380 - 2012-06-06
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 9, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46877 - 2010-02-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 9, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46877 - 2010-02-08
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 9, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33960 - 2008-10-06
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 9, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33960 - 2008-10-06