Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22571 - 22580 of 97683 for court records search online.
Search results 22571 - 22580 of 97683 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
the jury’s verdict. We will not upset the circuit court’s determination, because the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97145 - 2013-05-22
the jury’s verdict. We will not upset the circuit court’s determination, because the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97145 - 2013-05-22
COURT OF APPEALS
” and argues that the record is devoid of evidence rebutting this testimony. However, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31257 - 2007-12-19
” and argues that the record is devoid of evidence rebutting this testimony. However, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31257 - 2007-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 22, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52432 - 2010-07-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 22, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52432 - 2010-07-21
COURT OF APPEALS
failed to consider the proper sentencing factors. Indeed, the record reflects that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94485 - 2013-03-25
failed to consider the proper sentencing factors. Indeed, the record reflects that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94485 - 2013-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 31, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92269 - 2013-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 31, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92269 - 2013-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
of record, we affirm the trial court’s order denying a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.[3] ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36404 - 2009-05-12
of record, we affirm the trial court’s order denying a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.[3] ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36404 - 2009-05-12
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 27, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52568 - 2010-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 27, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52568 - 2010-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 21, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97057 - 2013-06-02
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 21, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97057 - 2013-06-02
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 5, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84491 - 2012-07-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 5, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84491 - 2012-07-04
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 10, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137005 - 2015-03-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 10, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137005 - 2015-03-09