Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22571 - 22580 of 29712 for des.

Richard G. Pool v. City of Sheboygan
de novo. See Cary v. City of Madison, 203 Wis. 2d 261, 264, 551 N.W.2d 596 (Ct. App. 1996). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25002 - 2006-06-27

COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35788 - 2009-03-09

Joseph N. Francis v. Maureen M. Francis
legal standard to a set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7565 - 2005-03-31

Janice L. Edwards v. Jeffery A. Edwards
of law which we decide de novo. In Norman v. Norman, we held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13824 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
a handful of cases in aid of his position that five of his claims should be reviewed de novo and two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92341 - 2014-09-15

James N. Elliott v. Michael L. Morgan
is de novo. See id. The statute at issue in this case is § 66.293(3), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11058 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
presents a legal issue that we review de novo. See id. ¶22 Our review of a circuit court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102333 - 2013-09-25

State v. David Watts
‘constitutional facts’ which this court may review de novo.” Michael R. B. v. State, 175 Wis.2d 713, 720, 499 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12962 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. Whether counsel’s assistance was ineffective is reviewed de novo. State v. Williams, 2006 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85742 - 2012-08-07

COURT OF APPEALS
to interpret and apply condemnation statutes to undisputed facts. This is a question of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36258 - 2009-04-22