Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22571 - 22580 of 29827 for des.
Search results 22571 - 22580 of 29827 for des.
2007 WI 22
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28173 - 2007-02-15
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28173 - 2007-02-15
State v. Scott E. Williams
the proper interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 970.03(10). Questions of statutory interpretation are reviewed de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16876 - 2005-03-31
the proper interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 970.03(10). Questions of statutory interpretation are reviewed de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16876 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 972.11(1)). We review the trial court’s application of constitutional principles de novo. Casarez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147788 - 2017-09-21
. § 972.11(1)). We review the trial court’s application of constitutional principles de novo. Casarez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147788 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
cites a handful of cases in aid of his position that five of his claims should be reviewed de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92341 - 2013-01-28
cites a handful of cases in aid of his position that five of his claims should be reviewed de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92341 - 2013-01-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and then review de novo whether those facts met the standard of a valid deed. See WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2) (2021
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717783 - 2023-10-24
and then review de novo whether those facts met the standard of a valid deed. See WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2) (2021
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717783 - 2023-10-24
R. Scott McCormick v. Richard A. Schubring
are questions of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Byrge, 2000 WI 101, ¶32, 237 Wis. 2d 197, 614 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16617 - 2005-03-31
are questions of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Byrge, 2000 WI 101, ¶32, 237 Wis. 2d 197, 614 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16617 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122726 - 2014-09-30
a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122726 - 2014-09-30
[PDF]
Charlie Tate, Jr. v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin
altogether. No. 99-3320 9 ¶18 In reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we employ a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16331 - 2017-09-21
altogether. No. 99-3320 9 ¶18 In reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we employ a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16331 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denial of a defendant’s motion for a Franks hearing is subject to de novo review. See State v. Manuel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138237 - 2017-09-21
denial of a defendant’s motion for a Franks hearing is subject to de novo review. See State v. Manuel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138237 - 2017-09-21
State v. Keith Schroeder
)(e) is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Deborah J.Z., 228 Wis. 2d 468, 472, 596 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15529 - 2005-03-31
)(e) is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Deborah J.Z., 228 Wis. 2d 468, 472, 596 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15529 - 2005-03-31