Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22571 - 22580 of 64166 for records.
Search results 22571 - 22580 of 64166 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
placement order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804986 - 2024-05-23
placement order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804986 - 2024-05-23
[PDF]
Kevin S. Froemel v. Northern States Power Company
the company of liability. We conclude that the record contains disputed facts concerning comparative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15051 - 2017-09-21
the company of liability. We conclude that the record contains disputed facts concerning comparative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15051 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record supports his underlying premise that he was charged under the three strikes penalty enhancer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123537 - 2014-10-14
in the record supports his underlying premise that he was charged under the three strikes penalty enhancer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123537 - 2014-10-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608829 - 2023-01-10
not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608829 - 2023-01-10
City of Racine v. Robert Robinson
trial and instead seeking a review of the forfeiture judgment based on the record of the municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9113 - 2005-03-31
trial and instead seeking a review of the forfeiture judgment based on the record of the municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9113 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595290 - 2022-11-29
. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595290 - 2022-11-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215753 - 2018-07-16
record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215753 - 2018-07-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on our review of the no-merit report and our independent review of the circuit court records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250840 - 2019-11-27
on our review of the no-merit report and our independent review of the circuit court records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250840 - 2019-11-27
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97572 - 2014-09-15
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97572 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Nathan O. Jones
plea at the level of the offense charged. After reviewing the record, we disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14024 - 2014-09-15
plea at the level of the offense charged. After reviewing the record, we disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14024 - 2014-09-15