Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22571 - 22580 of 58546 for speedy trial.
Search results 22571 - 22580 of 58546 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
of resentencing ordered in lieu of his request to withdraw his plea, and in March 2006 after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33344 - 2014-09-15
of resentencing ordered in lieu of his request to withdraw his plea, and in March 2006 after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33344 - 2014-09-15
City of Green Bay v. Donald J. Schleis
denying his motion for a new trial. He argues that (1) the circuit court erroneously instructed the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16135 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion for a new trial. He argues that (1) the circuit court erroneously instructed the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16135 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Bruce Martindale v. Bruce A. Ripp
action. He argues that he is entitled to a new trial because of the trial court’s erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15239 - 2017-09-21
action. He argues that he is entitled to a new trial because of the trial court’s erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15239 - 2017-09-21
State v. Scott W. Nagel
, as a habitual criminal, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 948.03(3)(c) and 939.62(1)(b).[1] Nagel argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4982 - 2005-03-31
, as a habitual criminal, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 948.03(3)(c) and 939.62(1)(b).[1] Nagel argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4982 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Scott W. Nagel
). 1 Nagel argues that the trial court erred by admitting other acts evidence and allowing what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4982 - 2017-09-19
). 1 Nagel argues that the trial court erred by admitting other acts evidence and allowing what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4982 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are from the testimony at the bench trial held on December 16, 2022
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=743397 - 2023-12-21
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are from the testimony at the bench trial held on December 16, 2022
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=743397 - 2023-12-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to a fact-finding hearing by a jury or to the court. Claribelys waived her right to a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142719 - 2017-09-21
to a fact-finding hearing by a jury or to the court. Claribelys waived her right to a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142719 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance from his trial counsel. The circuit court rejected his claims, and we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92461 - 2014-09-15
ineffective assistance from his trial counsel. The circuit court rejected his claims, and we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92461 - 2014-09-15
State v. Andre D. Mitchell
that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his confession, and (2) his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12705 - 2005-03-31
that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his confession, and (2) his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12705 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. Rivera argues his trial No. 2017AP191-CR 2 attorney was constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197683 - 2017-10-11
for postconviction relief. Rivera argues his trial No. 2017AP191-CR 2 attorney was constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197683 - 2017-10-11