Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22571 - 22580 of 58546 for speedy trial.
Search results 22571 - 22580 of 58546 for speedy trial.
Dane Co. DHS v. Shetria B.
, the court found good cause to postpone the trial based on the need to assign new counsel to Shetria B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26536 - 2006-09-20
, the court found good cause to postpone the trial based on the need to assign new counsel to Shetria B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26536 - 2006-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. At trial, the State called four eyewitnesses who identified Bowens as the shooter. The State also called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107616 - 2017-09-21
. At trial, the State called four eyewitnesses who identified Bowens as the shooter. The State also called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107616 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 22
to present any other grounds he may have had for appeal in that motion, and the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59033 - 2014-09-15
to present any other grounds he may have had for appeal in that motion, and the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59033 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ extended supervision. 3 ¶4 Buchanan filed a postconviction motion alleging that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198044 - 2017-10-24
’ extended supervision. 3 ¶4 Buchanan filed a postconviction motion alleging that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198044 - 2017-10-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
of resentencing ordered in lieu of his request to withdraw his plea, and in March 2006 after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33344 - 2014-09-15
of resentencing ordered in lieu of his request to withdraw his plea, and in March 2006 after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33344 - 2014-09-15
City of Green Bay v. Donald J. Schleis
denying his motion for a new trial. He argues that (1) the circuit court erroneously instructed the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16135 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion for a new trial. He argues that (1) the circuit court erroneously instructed the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16135 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Bruce Martindale v. Bruce A. Ripp
action. He argues that he is entitled to a new trial because of the trial court’s erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15239 - 2017-09-21
action. He argues that he is entitled to a new trial because of the trial court’s erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15239 - 2017-09-21
State v. Scott W. Nagel
, as a habitual criminal, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 948.03(3)(c) and 939.62(1)(b).[1] Nagel argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4982 - 2005-03-31
, as a habitual criminal, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 948.03(3)(c) and 939.62(1)(b).[1] Nagel argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4982 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Scott W. Nagel
). 1 Nagel argues that the trial court erred by admitting other acts evidence and allowing what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4982 - 2017-09-19
). 1 Nagel argues that the trial court erred by admitting other acts evidence and allowing what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4982 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are from the testimony at the bench trial held on December 16, 2022
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=743397 - 2023-12-21
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are from the testimony at the bench trial held on December 16, 2022
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=743397 - 2023-12-21