Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22581 - 22590 of 29823 for des.
Search results 22581 - 22590 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Gerald A. Edson
cases were multiplicitous. We review a claim of multiplicity de novo, owing no deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8401 - 2017-09-19
cases were multiplicitous. We review a claim of multiplicity de novo, owing no deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8401 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Timothy McCain
proceedings presents an issue of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See State v. Setagord
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12776 - 2017-09-21
proceedings presents an issue of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See State v. Setagord
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12776 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. Harold W.
, while proper, was also de minimis in the trial court’s ultimate decision. C. Evidence of Harold’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11465 - 2017-09-19
, while proper, was also de minimis in the trial court’s ultimate decision. C. Evidence of Harold’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11465 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Christopher J. Drexler
is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8837 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8837 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 4
Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. Grosse v. Protective Life Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206289 - 2018-02-12
Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. Grosse v. Protective Life Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206289 - 2018-02-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687574 - 2023-08-08
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687574 - 2023-08-08
[PDF]
WI 55
review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82876 - 2014-09-15
review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82876 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶13 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617844 - 2023-02-02
. DISCUSSION ¶13 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617844 - 2023-02-02
COURT OF APPEALS
scratch and examines the record de novo so that it can consider the facts directly on which the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114791 - 2014-06-18
scratch and examines the record de novo so that it can consider the facts directly on which the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114791 - 2014-06-18
Frontsheet
unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140598 - 2015-04-23
unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140598 - 2015-04-23