Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22581 - 22590 of 82944 for simple case search.
Search results 22581 - 22590 of 82944 for simple case search.
2009 WI APP 38
2009 WI App 38 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP1681 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35503 - 2009-03-24
2009 WI App 38 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP1681 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35503 - 2009-03-24
State v. Todd D. Moskonas
that the treatment order is void. The State relies on § 973.13, Stats., which provides: In any case where the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10461 - 2005-03-31
that the treatment order is void. The State relies on § 973.13, Stats., which provides: In any case where the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10461 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
driver’s license. The trial court granted the motion and that case was adjourned. On February 2, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30324 - 2014-09-15
driver’s license. The trial court granted the motion and that case was adjourned. On February 2, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30324 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Tina M. Satzke
briefly comment on the position of the State that we should treat this case under the rubric of due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24705 - 2017-09-21
briefly comment on the position of the State that we should treat this case under the rubric of due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24705 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
State v. Tina M. Satzke
comment on the position of the State that we should treat this case under the rubric of due process rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24705 - 2006-04-04
comment on the position of the State that we should treat this case under the rubric of due process rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24705 - 2006-04-04
COURT OF APPEALS
because the criminal case was the same “matter in controversy” as the TPR under SCR 60.04 and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124790 - 2014-10-21
because the criminal case was the same “matter in controversy” as the TPR under SCR 60.04 and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124790 - 2014-10-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
28, 2019, Gladney filed the initial complaint in this case, seeking $10,000 for property damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666528 - 2023-06-13
28, 2019, Gladney filed the initial complaint in this case, seeking $10,000 for property damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666528 - 2023-06-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. of Workforce Dev. v. LIRC, 2016 WI App 21, ¶7, 367 Wis. 2d 609, 877 N.W.2d 620. This case also involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173624 - 2017-09-21
. of Workforce Dev. v. LIRC, 2016 WI App 21, ¶7, 367 Wis. 2d 609, 877 N.W.2d 620. This case also involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173624 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
Programs in connection with the prison sentence ordered in Kenosha County case No. 2011CF179, this finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147266 - 2015-09-01
Programs in connection with the prison sentence ordered in Kenosha County case No. 2011CF179, this finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147266 - 2015-09-01