Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2261 - 2270 of 22261 for WA 0821 1305 0400 [[Adefa]] Agen Geocell Perkuatan Lereng Heavy Duty Kaimana Papua Barat.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
’ claims. The Larsens argue that two exceptions to the immunity doctrine apply: the ministerial duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116144 - 2017-09-21

Arthur Louis Spencer v. County of Brown
the safe-place statute imposes a ministerial duty to take reasonable action to make the jail showers safe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12017 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Sheri D. Meyers v. Patrick Schultz
and application of the ministerial duty exception to immunity for state employees. Sheri Meyers was injured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7334 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Arthur Louis Spencer v. County of Brown
. 1996), is controlling on the issue whether the safe-place statute imposes a ministerial duty to equip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12017 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
to the immunity doctrine apply: the ministerial duty exception and the clear and compelling danger exception. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116144 - 2014-07-02

Sheri D. Meyers v. Patrick Schultz
on this appeal concerns the scope and application of the ministerial duty exception to immunity for state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7334 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Hoida, Inc. v. M&I Midstate Bank
showing that they did not breach the duty of ordinary care under the circumstances by not undertaking
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25525 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 174
before the court was whether the sheriff’s constitutional duty to attend to the courts and administer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34647 - 2014-09-15

2008 WI APP 174
the court was whether the sheriff’s constitutional duty to attend to the courts and administer the jail can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34647 - 2011-06-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was not entitled to governmental immunity because the ministerial duty and known and compelling danger exceptions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106646 - 2017-09-21