Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2261 - 2270 of 57317 for id.
Search results 2261 - 2270 of 57317 for id.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
introduced as evidence at trial. Id. at *1. We affirmed Dressler’s conviction on appeal. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533274 - 2022-06-16
introduced as evidence at trial. Id. at *1. We affirmed Dressler’s conviction on appeal. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533274 - 2022-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously exercised its discretion. Id. at 500-51. ¶9 The facts of Grinder are analogous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73203 - 2011-11-02
erroneously exercised its discretion. Id. at 500-51. ¶9 The facts of Grinder are analogous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73203 - 2011-11-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
exists. See id., ¶36. Second, the defendant must show that the new factor justifies sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208212 - 2018-02-06
exists. See id., ¶36. Second, the defendant must show that the new factor justifies sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208212 - 2018-02-06
William E. Johnson v. Donna M. Johnson
are considered in arriving at ‘a conclusion based on logic and founded on proper legal standards.’” Id. at 441
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14312 - 2005-03-31
are considered in arriving at ‘a conclusion based on logic and founded on proper legal standards.’” Id. at 441
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14312 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence is for the jury. Id. at 504. ¶9 We view the evidence in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70797 - 2011-09-16
of the evidence is for the jury. Id. at 504. ¶9 We view the evidence in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70797 - 2011-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. at 27. ¶10 We are guided in this case by our opinion in State v. Foster. In Foster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36610 - 2009-05-27
. Id. at 27. ¶10 We are guided in this case by our opinion in State v. Foster. In Foster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36610 - 2009-05-27
State v. Joseph P. Buchholz
analysis. Id. at 195. The trial court’s findings of evidentiary or historical fact will not be disturbed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4161 - 2005-03-31
analysis. Id. at 195. The trial court’s findings of evidentiary or historical fact will not be disturbed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4161 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id., ¶5. The car came within twelve inches of the center line and within six to eight feet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61344 - 2011-03-22
.” Id., ¶5. The car came within twelve inches of the center line and within six to eight feet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61344 - 2011-03-22
State v. James Martindale
the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary factors to be considered by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21468 - 2006-02-20
the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary factors to be considered by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21468 - 2006-02-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
the right part of the parking lane and back toward the center lane.” Id., ¶5. The car came within twelve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61344 - 2014-09-15
the right part of the parking lane and back toward the center lane.” Id., ¶5. The car came within twelve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61344 - 2014-09-15