Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22601 - 22610 of 29817 for des.
Search results 22601 - 22610 of 29817 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Dion C. Mitchell
a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6225 - 2017-09-19
a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6225 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but the application of constitutional principles to those facts is reviewed de novo. State v. Vorburger, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174189 - 2017-09-21
, but the application of constitutional principles to those facts is reviewed de novo. State v. Vorburger, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174189 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
such questions de novo, see State v. Robertson, 2003 WI App 84, ¶24, 263 Wis. 2d 349, 661 N.W.2d 105. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347170 - 2021-03-23
such questions de novo, see State v. Robertson, 2003 WI App 84, ¶24, 263 Wis. 2d 349, 661 N.W.2d 105. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347170 - 2021-03-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
erroneous, but we apply constitutional principles to the facts de novo. Id. Here, the facts are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28573 - 2007-03-26
erroneous, but we apply constitutional principles to the facts de novo. Id. Here, the facts are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28573 - 2007-03-26
2007 WI APP 152
This case requires that we interpret Wis. Stat. § 895.04(4), a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29238 - 2007-06-26
This case requires that we interpret Wis. Stat. § 895.04(4), a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29238 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
legal custody and primary physical placement of Y.S. Schworck filed a petition for a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142942 - 2017-09-21
legal custody and primary physical placement of Y.S. Schworck filed a petition for a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142942 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and the GAL. ¶12 We review questions of statutory construction de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878773 - 2024-11-19
and the GAL. ¶12 We review questions of statutory construction de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878773 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth P. Sarauer
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Williams, 2002 WI 58, ¶7, 253 Wis. 2d 99, 644 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6136 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Williams, 2002 WI 58, ¶7, 253 Wis. 2d 99, 644 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6136 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statute to a given set of facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶13. ¶8 Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66888 - 2014-09-15
statute to a given set of facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶13. ¶8 Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66888 - 2014-09-15
State v. Scott Heimermann
reviewing “[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8548 - 2005-03-31
reviewing “[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8548 - 2005-03-31