Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22601 - 22610 of 57556 for id.

Stupar River LLC v. Town of Linwood Board of Review
. of Review, 137 Wis. 2d 626, 625, 405 N.W.2d 344 (1987). We presume the Board acted correctly. See id. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17803 - 2005-05-02

State v. Randy A. Schill
effort is made to avoid determinations of ineffectiveness based on hindsight. Id. ¶22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4629 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
apartment, that error was not prejudicial. See id. at 694 (trial counsel error deprives defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88859 - 2012-10-31

[PDF] Letter Brief (Congressmen)
that such a date is needed given the various deadlines for the upcoming 2022 elections. Id. In particular
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/ltrbriefcongressmen.pdf - 2021-10-18

[PDF] State v. Jose M. Aldazabal
.'" Id. (citation omitted). Parole revocation proceedings are not "essentially criminal" because "[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8356 - 2017-09-19

County of Dane v. Todd M. Oimoen
permissible even when the suspect offers to take an alternative test. Id. at ¶3. Because Oimoen does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4808 - 2005-03-31

[MS WORD] GF-243A: Motion to Redact Protected Information in Transcript(s)
the transcript(s) to the court. Protected information only includes social security, employer or tax ID, driver
/formdisplay/GF-243A.doc?formNumber=GF-243A&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2018-08-24

COURT OF APPEALS
issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Id. A defendant who seeks resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86311 - 2012-08-20

New Lagoon Campground Condominium Association v. Polk County Board of Adjustment
whenever land would otherwise have no other feasible use. Id. Put another way, zoning authorities may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9308 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jose M. Aldazabal
). "This risk is absent from proceedings which are not `essentially criminal.'" Id. (citation omitted). Parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8356 - 2005-03-31