Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22601 - 22610 of 58499 for speedy trial.
Search results 22601 - 22610 of 58499 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Walter F. Cline
, P.J.1 In this criminal case, Walter F. Cline filed a motion with the trial court seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16045 - 2017-09-21
, P.J.1 In this criminal case, Walter F. Cline filed a motion with the trial court seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16045 - 2017-09-21
Nicholas S. Schreiner v. Up North Plastics, Inc.
., Westfield Insurance Co., and Henry Huffcutt Co., Inc., appeal a summary judgment of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25491 - 2006-07-25
., Westfield Insurance Co., and Henry Huffcutt Co., Inc., appeal a summary judgment of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25491 - 2006-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
by JFM. We conclude that summary judgment was properly granted and affirm the trial court’s order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60218 - 2011-02-22
by JFM. We conclude that summary judgment was properly granted and affirm the trial court’s order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60218 - 2011-02-22
State v. Scott W. Nagel
, as a habitual criminal, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 948.03(3)(c) and 939.62(1)(b).[1] Nagel argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4982 - 2010-06-30
, as a habitual criminal, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 948.03(3)(c) and 939.62(1)(b).[1] Nagel argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4982 - 2010-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief in the trial court by August 31, 2011, he would lose his rights to both. We expressly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86128 - 2012-08-21
for postconviction relief in the trial court by August 31, 2011, he would lose his rights to both. We expressly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86128 - 2012-08-21
State v. Walter F. Cline
] In this criminal case, Walter F. Cline filed a motion with the trial court seeking to suppress two confessions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16045 - 2005-03-31
] In this criminal case, Walter F. Cline filed a motion with the trial court seeking to suppress two confessions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16045 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. Lelinski sought a new trial, claiming that the State had failed to disclose exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108345 - 2014-02-24
for postconviction relief. Lelinski sought a new trial, claiming that the State had failed to disclose exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108345 - 2014-02-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial. Because we conclude that McLemore’s attorney was not ineffective, we affirm the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209861 - 2018-05-10
trial. Because we conclude that McLemore’s attorney was not ineffective, we affirm the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209861 - 2018-05-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶7 In the meantime, the trial court denied Dr. Bartel’s summary judgment motion and granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90059 - 2014-09-15
. ¶7 In the meantime, the trial court denied Dr. Bartel’s summary judgment motion and granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90059 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the admissibility of custodial statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103706 - 2005-03-31
that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the admissibility of custodial statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103706 - 2005-03-31