Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22611 - 22620 of 29827 for des.
Search results 22611 - 22620 of 29827 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
standard, and we review the application of law to those facts de novo. See State v. Hughes, 2000 WI 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84417 - 2012-07-04
standard, and we review the application of law to those facts de novo. See State v. Hughes, 2000 WI 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84417 - 2012-07-04
State v. Dennis L. Richardson
review de novo. Michels, 150 Wis. 2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279. A defendant has the burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3673 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Michels, 150 Wis. 2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279. A defendant has the burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3673 - 2005-03-31
Regent Insurance Company v. City of Manitowoc
grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9601 - 2005-03-31
grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9601 - 2005-03-31
Angela M. Peabody v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13078 - 2005-03-31
review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13078 - 2005-03-31
Thomas Strasser v. Transtech Mobile Fleet Service, Inc.
is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987). Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14098 - 2005-03-31
is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987). Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14098 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mervel L. Eagans, Jr.
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 101, 457 N.W.2d 299, 311 (1990). The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13790 - 2005-03-31
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 101, 457 N.W.2d 299, 311 (1990). The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13790 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
U.S. 348, 353, 356-57 (2015) (rejecting concept of “an acceptable ‘de minimis intrusion’” in context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256754 - 2020-03-17
U.S. 348, 353, 356-57 (2015) (rejecting concept of “an acceptable ‘de minimis intrusion’” in context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256754 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pose questions of law we review de novo. See Mittnacht v. St. Paul Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 2009 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252638 - 2020-01-22
pose questions of law we review de novo. See Mittnacht v. St. Paul Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 2009 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252638 - 2020-01-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28828 - 2014-09-15
are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28828 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jay D. Harris
which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37. ¶18 Harris argues that his trial counsel did not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16062 - 2017-09-21
which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37. ¶18 Harris argues that his trial counsel did not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16062 - 2017-09-21