Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22621 - 22630 of 29712 for des.
Search results 22621 - 22630 of 29712 for des.
[PDF]
WI APP 108
, but the ultimate legal question is decided de novo. Id. A defendant’s No. 2012AP2044-CR 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100162 - 2017-09-21
, but the ultimate legal question is decided de novo. Id. A defendant’s No. 2012AP2044-CR 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100162 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 36
upon a question of law, we review the question de novo, benefiting from the [circuit] court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107216 - 2017-09-21
upon a question of law, we review the question de novo, benefiting from the [circuit] court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107216 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Weber II
principles to historic facts. We review, de novo, the circuit court’s findings of constitutional fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5040 - 2017-09-19
principles to historic facts. We review, de novo, the circuit court’s findings of constitutional fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5040 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2021AP876 5 of law that this court reviews de novo.” Racine Cnty. v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613259 - 2023-01-24
. No. 2021AP876 5 of law that this court reviews de novo.” Racine Cnty. v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613259 - 2023-01-24
[PDF]
Ronald M. Hubbard v. Peot Construction, Inc.
reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16177 - 2017-09-21
reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16177 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
uphold the [circuit] court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001148 - 2025-08-26
uphold the [circuit] court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001148 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
Reply Brief per CTO of 11-17-21 (Congressmen)
, and RONALD ZAHN, PETITIONERS, BLACK LEADERS ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITIES, VOCES DE LA FRONTERA, LEAGUE
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/replybrcongressmen.pdf - 2022-01-05
, and RONALD ZAHN, PETITIONERS, BLACK LEADERS ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITIES, VOCES DE LA FRONTERA, LEAGUE
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/replybrcongressmen.pdf - 2022-01-05
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 17-07 memo
, except for the following: (a) A proceeding before a court commissioner that may be reviewed de novo
/supreme/docs/1707memo.pdf - 2017-05-30
, except for the following: (a) A proceeding before a court commissioner that may be reviewed de novo
/supreme/docs/1707memo.pdf - 2017-05-30
[PDF]
Response to Letter Briefs (BLOC)
for Communities, Voces de la Frontera, the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, Cindy Fallona, Lauren Stephenson
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/resltrbriefsbloc.pdf - 2021-10-18
for Communities, Voces de la Frontera, the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, Cindy Fallona, Lauren Stephenson
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/resltrbriefsbloc.pdf - 2021-10-18
State v. Perles Payne
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9556 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9556 - 2005-03-31