Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22621 - 22630 of 29832 for des.
Search results 22621 - 22630 of 29832 for des.
William W. Welter v. City of Milwaukee
. Although we have been assisted by the trial court's well-reasoned written opinion, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11483 - 2005-03-31
. Although we have been assisted by the trial court's well-reasoned written opinion, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11483 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 171
of law that we review de novo. See Nelson v. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41828 - 2014-09-15
of law that we review de novo. See Nelson v. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41828 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 26
. § 88.87(2)(c). Interpretation and application of a statute are matters of law we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257385 - 2020-06-15
. § 88.87(2)(c). Interpretation and application of a statute are matters of law we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257385 - 2020-06-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as the court did not clearly err, but we review de novo whether the facts meet the deficiency or prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249234 - 2019-10-30
as the court did not clearly err, but we review de novo whether the facts meet the deficiency or prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249234 - 2019-10-30
State v. Thomas D. Myers
is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. When we address whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10115 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. When we address whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10115 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 707, 718 N.W.2d 260. We review questions of law de novo, but we do not disturb factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133135 - 2015-01-20
. 2d 707, 718 N.W.2d 260. We review questions of law de novo, but we do not disturb factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133135 - 2015-01-20
[PDF]
David J. Carmain v. Affiliated Capital Corporation
, this particular issue involves questions of statutory interpretation which we decide de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4604 - 2017-09-19
, this particular issue involves questions of statutory interpretation which we decide de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4604 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Demitrius Goodlow
instruction presents a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 191 Wis. 2d at 23. ¶25 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14910 - 2017-09-21
instruction presents a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 191 Wis. 2d at 23. ¶25 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14910 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Hampton, 2004 WI 107, ¶46, 274 Wis. 2d 379, 683 N.W.2d 14. We review de novo the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87851 - 2014-09-15
. Hampton, 2004 WI 107, ¶46, 274 Wis. 2d 379, 683 N.W.2d 14. We review de novo the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87851 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to due process is a question of law for de novo review. State v. Coffee, 2020 WI 1, ¶17, 389 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290803 - 2020-09-24
to due process is a question of law for de novo review. State v. Coffee, 2020 WI 1, ¶17, 389 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290803 - 2020-09-24