Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22621 - 22630 of 29832 for des.

[PDF] Brown County v. Jessica M.
questions of law we review de novo. Czapinski v. St. Francis Hosp., 2000 WI 80, ¶12, 236 Wis. 2d 316
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6634 - 2017-09-20

Benedetta Balistrieri v. Joseph P. Balistrieri
not be elaborated here. See Wis. Stat. § 802.08(2). Our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5367 - 2005-03-31

David V. Straub v. Shawn K. Straub
. We determine de novo whether the circuit court applied the correct law in arriving at a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19128 - 2005-07-27

American National Property and Casualty Company v. Marderos Nersesian
consolidated by order of this court. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶13 We review summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7136 - 2005-03-31

Town of La Grange v. Robert J. Auchinleck
, Stats. This presents a question of law which we review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11719 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 9
No. 2008AP2233-CR 4 interpretation subject to de novo review. See State v. Long, 2009 WI 36, ¶20, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44174 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 131
that are material to this appeal, and we review de novo whether the settlement agreement may be enforced. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88252 - 2014-09-15

Richard P. Selerski v. Village of West Milwaukee
court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10668 - 2005-03-31

State v. Mary E. Schoate
for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12152 - 2005-03-31

Leo W. Ziulkowski v. Gregory M. Nierengarten
to assert prejudice later"), or at least tacitly conceded the de minimis nature of counsel's comment. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11095 - 2005-03-31