Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22621 - 22630 of 57907 for id.

[PDF] State v. Michael R.
as the paramount consideration. Id. The court has discretion as to the weight it affords each of the criteria
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9173 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
to show one prong, the court need not address the other. Id. at 697. The first prong of Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56964 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Douglas A. Cavallari
third parties, the buyer and seller will be criminally liable for conspiracy. See id. at 501, 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11753 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
by “refer[ence] to a document signed by the defendant that includes the elements.” See id., ¶56. Here
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204970 - 2017-12-08

State v. Levi J.D.
if it makes its determination according to accepted legal standards and the facts of record. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12065 - 2005-03-31

State v. Pablo Martin Rios
(1967). Consent is one of the recognized exceptions. Id. at 358 n.22. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5590 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 138
). We first determine whether the complaint states a claim. Id. If the complaint states a claim, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39827 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
recollection of the witness’s initial encounter with the suspect.” Id. (citation omitted). The State has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61362 - 2011-03-16

Society Insurance v. Town of Franklin
injury. Id. at 262 (citations omitted). The majority of courts that have considered the issue have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14827 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
a restriction is ultimately reasonable in light of the facts is a question of law. Id. Courts assess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31865 - 2014-09-15