Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22621 - 22630 of 58542 for speedy trial.
Search results 22621 - 22630 of 58542 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
the trial court’s order. ¶2 When reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we apply the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60218 - 2014-09-15
the trial court’s order. ¶2 When reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we apply the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60218 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James D. Minniecheske
of conviction to remove an order for restitution, the trial court should have ordered the State to reimburse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14015 - 2014-09-15
of conviction to remove an order for restitution, the trial court should have ordered the State to reimburse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14015 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief in the trial court by August 31, 2011, he would lose his rights to both. We expressly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86128 - 2012-08-21
for postconviction relief in the trial court by August 31, 2011, he would lose his rights to both. We expressly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86128 - 2012-08-21
[PDF]
State v. Kevin P. Sullivan
. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly admitted “other acts” evidence against Sullivan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11217 - 2017-09-19
. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly admitted “other acts” evidence against Sullivan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11217 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Dilworth
to WIS. STAT. § 941.23 (2003-04). 2 Dilworth contends that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18176 - 2017-09-21
to WIS. STAT. § 941.23 (2003-04). 2 Dilworth contends that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18176 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Todd D. Moskonas
and Deininger, JJ. VERGERONT, J. Todd Moskonas appeals from the trial court's order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10461 - 2017-09-20
and Deininger, JJ. VERGERONT, J. Todd Moskonas appeals from the trial court's order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10461 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Daman H., and an order denying postdisposition relief. Scott contends his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82482 - 2014-09-15
, Daman H., and an order denying postdisposition relief. Scott contends his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82482 - 2014-09-15
State v. James D. Minniecheske
the judgment of conviction to remove an order for restitution, the trial court should have ordered the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14015 - 2005-03-31
the judgment of conviction to remove an order for restitution, the trial court should have ordered the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14015 - 2005-03-31
Bruce Martindale v. Bruce A. Ripp
is entitled to a new trial because of the trial court’s erroneous evidentiary rulings. Specifically, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15239 - 2005-03-31
is entitled to a new trial because of the trial court’s erroneous evidentiary rulings. Specifically, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15239 - 2005-03-31
96-08.PDF
is amended to read: 23.77(1) If in circuit court either party files a written demand for a jury trial
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85484 - 2012-07-23
is amended to read: 23.77(1) If in circuit court either party files a written demand for a jury trial
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85484 - 2012-07-23