Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22621 - 22630 of 58531 for speedy trial.
Search results 22621 - 22630 of 58531 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
postdisposition relief. Scott contends his trial counsel was ineffective. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Daman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82482 - 2012-05-14
postdisposition relief. Scott contends his trial counsel was ineffective. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Daman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82482 - 2012-05-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial, of second-degree sexual assault of a child. The court sentenced Horrighs to eight years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242538 - 2019-06-19
trial, of second-degree sexual assault of a child. The court sentenced Horrighs to eight years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242538 - 2019-06-19
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. Lelinski sought a new trial, claiming that the State had failed to disclose exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108345 - 2014-02-24
for postconviction relief. Lelinski sought a new trial, claiming that the State had failed to disclose exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108345 - 2014-02-24
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Dilworth
to WIS. STAT. § 941.23 (2003-04). 2 Dilworth contends that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18176 - 2017-09-21
to WIS. STAT. § 941.23 (2003-04). 2 Dilworth contends that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18176 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the trial court’s order. ¶2 When reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we apply the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60218 - 2014-09-15
the trial court’s order. ¶2 When reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we apply the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60218 - 2014-09-15
Bruce Martindale v. Bruce A. Ripp
is entitled to a new trial because of the trial court’s erroneous evidentiary rulings. Specifically, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15239 - 2005-03-31
is entitled to a new trial because of the trial court’s erroneous evidentiary rulings. Specifically, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15239 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 209
. The No. 2006AP2292 3 trial court dismissed Coakley’s amended complaint because it concluded that Coakley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29960 - 2014-09-15
. The No. 2006AP2292 3 trial court dismissed Coakley’s amended complaint because it concluded that Coakley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29960 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of one count of false imprisonment. He seeks a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174847 - 2017-09-21
of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of one count of false imprisonment. He seeks a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174847 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 10
demonstrates are based on the claim that WPS had no right to rescind the contract. The trial court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27590 - 2014-09-15
demonstrates are based on the claim that WPS had no right to rescind the contract. The trial court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27590 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 10
are based on the claim that WPS had no right to rescind the contract. The trial court granted summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27590 - 2007-02-06
are based on the claim that WPS had no right to rescind the contract. The trial court granted summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27590 - 2007-02-06