Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22631 - 22640 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] County of Langlade v. Michael N. Kaster
a claim for adverse possession and an easement by prescriptive use. No. 95-2694 -4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9748 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Darla L. Gebhard v. Kelvin G. Gebhard
that the trial judge did not make a sufficient subjective determination as to his impartiality. He also claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4437 - 2017-09-19

State v. Cody J. Vandenberg
on July 14-15, 1995. Vandenberg claimed that this testimony provided newly discovered evidence which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13086 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Russell L. Rose
whether it was in the nature of a Machner 1 hearing. Rose’s counsel explained that Rose’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4974 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Anthony W. Quattrochi
-leg stand test, Quattrochi claimed that he could not perform that test. Schmidt then asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13271 - 2017-09-21

Lynda Kramschuster v. Shawn E.
). In this case, McClelland argues that Kramschuster’s complaint fails to state a claim because the facts alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11687 - 2005-03-31

Glinder Drake v. Marcia E. Huber
summary judgment in favor of Huber. Huber claims that the trial court erred by failing to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11569 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
acts evidence. We reject Weddle’s argument because the evidence he claims his trial counsel failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27384 - 2006-12-11

[PDF] Richard Pierce v. Gary Norwick
. On appeal, the Pierces make the following claims: (1) the jury's award of damages in the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10216 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI APP 49
Repetti’s claim. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶2 The scope of our review drives our analysis in this case. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28228 - 2014-09-15