Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22631 - 22640 of 58303 for speedy trial.

Nancy J. Fleege v. St. Mary's Nursing Home, Inc.
, Michael J. Fleege, and Ralph A. Fleege, the children of Nancy A. Fleege, appeal from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12376 - 2005-03-31

State v. Matthew M. Engevold
of counsel. On motions after verdict, the circuit court denied Engevold’s request for a new trial. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13572 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
a trial court may consider all reliable information when sentencing, we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30481 - 2007-10-02

[PDF] Roxanne L. (Wong) Hefti v. Chun Wing Wong
, under § 806.07(1)(h), STATS., to reopen a trial court order and judgment on child support. The issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11328 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
completed a sexual No. 2006AP2166-CR 2 assault. Because a trial court may consider all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30481 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Carlton S. C.-B.
issue for review— whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress physical evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9526 - 2017-09-19

State v. Cory Gilmore
. Gilmore claims the trial court erred in finding his claim was barred by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25907 - 2006-08-29

[PDF] State v. Carl P. Fike
., and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Fike contends that he is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8980 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Otis J. Braxton
-defense. However, because the trial court reasonably determined the facts adduced at trial could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15302 - 2017-09-21

Leonard Jones v. Leon Kruchten, Sr.
. The trial court properly offset the tenant’s award in entering judgment. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14326 - 2005-03-31