Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22651 - 22660 of 30243 for de.
Search results 22651 - 22660 of 30243 for de.
State v. John Foster Fant
we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13116 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13116 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶21 WISCONSIN STAT. § 48.9795(12) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964656 - 2025-06-03
standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶21 WISCONSIN STAT. § 48.9795(12) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964656 - 2025-06-03
[PDF]
State v. Joseph J.J.
(2), STATS. We review questions of law de novo. Ball v. Dist. No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12581 - 2017-09-21
(2), STATS. We review questions of law de novo. Ball v. Dist. No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12581 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo.” E-Z Roll Off, LLC v. County of Oneida, 2011 WI 71, ¶16, 335 Wis. 2d 720, 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963127 - 2025-06-03
that we review de novo.” E-Z Roll Off, LLC v. County of Oneida, 2011 WI 71, ¶16, 335 Wis. 2d 720, 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963127 - 2025-06-03
Karen C. Martin v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Johnsen, and also the application of a statute. Accordingly, our review is de novo. See West Bend Mut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2969 - 2005-03-31
Johnsen, and also the application of a statute. Accordingly, our review is de novo. See West Bend Mut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2969 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joshua N. Briggs
of statutory interpretation which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Cvorovic, 158 Wis.2d 630, 632-33
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12547 - 2017-09-21
of statutory interpretation which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Cvorovic, 158 Wis.2d 630, 632-33
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12547 - 2017-09-21
Sherri Korntved v. Advanced Healthcare
. ¶8 In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19040 - 2005-09-19
. ¶8 In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19040 - 2005-09-19
[PDF]
Fred Carlson v. Trailer Equipment and Supply, Inc.
on summary judgment de novo. See id. Second, we review the denial of Carlson’s motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14916 - 2017-09-21
on summary judgment de novo. See id. Second, we review the denial of Carlson’s motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14916 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Burnett County v. AFSCME Local 279-A
review de novo by applying the same standards set forth in § 802.08(2), STATS., employed by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10940 - 2017-09-20
review de novo by applying the same standards set forth in § 802.08(2), STATS., employed by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10940 - 2017-09-20
Jason Ritzel v. Wausau Business Insurance Company
of a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Stipetich v. Grosshans, 2000 WI App 100, ¶10, 235
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3423 - 2005-03-31
of a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Stipetich v. Grosshans, 2000 WI App 100, ¶10, 235
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3423 - 2005-03-31