Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22651 - 22660 of 29810 for des.
Search results 22651 - 22660 of 29810 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Luis R. Davila-Diaz
] or [Davila-Diaz] tell you why they had to kill Carmen Hernandez and Juan De[L]ossantos? A. They were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6511 - 2017-09-19
] or [Davila-Diaz] tell you why they had to kill Carmen Hernandez and Juan De[L]ossantos? A. They were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6511 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Roger P. Barber
facts’ which this court may review de novo.” Id. The constitutional right to present evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13447 - 2017-09-21
facts’ which this court may review de novo.” Id. The constitutional right to present evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13447 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Terry L. Benn v. James H. Benn
of whether those changes are substantial is a question of law which we review de novo. See Rosplock, 217
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14631 - 2017-09-21
of whether those changes are substantial is a question of law which we review de novo. See Rosplock, 217
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14631 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286276 - 2020-09-10
to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286276 - 2020-09-10
[PDF]
Sanford Gibson v. Department of Corrections
directives, we decided de novo whether a DOR directive was a rule as defined in § 227.01(13)(a), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8117 - 2017-09-19
directives, we decided de novo whether a DOR directive was a rule as defined in § 227.01(13)(a), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8117 - 2017-09-19
2006 WI APP 264
that such a violation is at best “de minimus.” The comment opines: “Enforcement will be denied only if the factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27183 - 2006-12-19
that such a violation is at best “de minimus.” The comment opines: “Enforcement will be denied only if the factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27183 - 2006-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and the statute, Wis. Stat. § 905.065 (2007-08),[2] present questions of law that we review de novo. Davis, 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44993 - 2009-12-29
and the statute, Wis. Stat. § 905.065 (2007-08),[2] present questions of law that we review de novo. Davis, 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44993 - 2009-12-29
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a handful of cases in aid of his position that five of his claims should be reviewed de novo and two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92341 - 2014-09-15
a handful of cases in aid of his position that five of his claims should be reviewed de novo and two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92341 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Alexander R. Armstrong
are questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5161 - 2017-09-19
are questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5161 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Thomas M. Berends v. Mack Truck, Inc.
construction presents a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3804 - 2017-09-20
construction presents a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3804 - 2017-09-20