Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22671 - 22680 of 83344 for case search.
Search results 22671 - 22680 of 83344 for case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the State failed to prove that one of the alleged prior offenses, a 2001 State of Oregon case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248781 - 2019-10-17
that the State failed to prove that one of the alleged prior offenses, a 2001 State of Oregon case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248781 - 2019-10-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1066767 - 2026-01-23
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1066767 - 2026-01-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638833 - 2023-03-29
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638833 - 2023-03-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286985 - 2020-09-16
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286985 - 2020-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288841 - 2020-09-17
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288841 - 2020-09-17
State v. Peter R. Burgeson
case in Waukesha County that he wanted to know the outcome of before proceeding with the instant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13136 - 2005-03-31
case in Waukesha County that he wanted to know the outcome of before proceeding with the instant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13136 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the obstructing charge in this case. The court denied the motion without a hearing, noting that the obstructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069223 - 2026-01-29
on the obstructing charge in this case. The court denied the motion without a hearing, noting that the obstructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069223 - 2026-01-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the judgment roll, “present[ed] a prima facie case” that Darrow was liable on her claim. Murray has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54834 - 2014-09-15
to the judgment roll, “present[ed] a prima facie case” that Darrow was liable on her claim. Murray has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54834 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238399 - 2019-03-29
. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238399 - 2019-03-29
[PDF]
Jim Mattson v. Thomas O. Schultz
these arguments and affirm the judgment. Schultz represented Jim Mattson in an age discrimination case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9817 - 2017-09-19
these arguments and affirm the judgment. Schultz represented Jim Mattson in an age discrimination case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9817 - 2017-09-19