Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22671 - 22680 of 83344 for case search.
Search results 22671 - 22680 of 83344 for case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155108 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155108 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the centerline. Based upon my review of the briefs and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238833 - 2019-04-08
the centerline. Based upon my review of the briefs and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238833 - 2019-04-08
Jim Mattson v. Thomas O. Schultz
discrimination case. Under the terms of the contract, Schultz was to receive one-third of the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9817 - 2005-03-31
discrimination case. Under the terms of the contract, Schultz was to receive one-third of the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9817 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the obstructing charge in this case. The court denied the motion without a hearing, noting that the obstructing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069223 - 2026-01-29
on the obstructing charge in this case. The court denied the motion without a hearing, noting that the obstructing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069223 - 2026-01-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the State failed to prove that one of the alleged prior offenses, a 2001 State of Oregon case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248781 - 2019-10-17
that the State failed to prove that one of the alleged prior offenses, a 2001 State of Oregon case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248781 - 2019-10-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1066767 - 2026-01-23
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1066767 - 2026-01-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638833 - 2023-03-29
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638833 - 2023-03-29
[PDF]
Michael G. Plourde v. Jeffrey W. Guettinger
case. On appeal, the Plourdes argue that the trial court misconstrued the mortgage foreclosure case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12579 - 2017-09-21
case. On appeal, the Plourdes argue that the trial court misconstrued the mortgage foreclosure case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12579 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286985 - 2020-09-16
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286985 - 2020-09-16
[PDF]
State v. Shawn Schulpius
2001 WI 69 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 00-0095 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16350 - 2017-09-21
2001 WI 69 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 00-0095 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16350 - 2017-09-21