Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22671 - 22680 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment, applying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336672 - 2021-02-17

Iowa County Department of Human Services v. Mary M.K.
by the circuit court is a question of law which we review de novo. See Thomas Y. v. Saint Croix County, 175 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2164 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
uphold the [circuit] court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001148 - 2025-08-26

Frontsheet
," and the application of these historical facts to constitutional principles, which we review de novo. Id., ¶¶18-19
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36600 - 2009-05-26

Rene Faye Zastrow v. Neal Alan Zastrow
presents us with a question of law that we review de novo. Lake Country Racquet & Athletic Club, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7292 - 2005-03-31

Keith K. Kost v. Neal Alan Zastrow
presents us with a question of law that we review de novo. Lake Country Racquet & Athletic Club, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7293 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Pablo Cruz Santana
magistrate” is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo and without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12747 - 2017-09-21

Todd A. Erdmann v. SF Broadcasting of Green Bay, Inc.
. Analysis We review the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14503 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. “The interpretation and application of statutes are questions of law that we review de novo.” Christensen v. Sullivan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40933 - 2009-09-14

[PDF] Richard G. Paar v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
proceedings de novo and apply the same standards that the circuit court did. See generally Preloznik v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9634 - 2017-09-19