Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22671 - 22680 of 46103 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 22671 - 22680 of 46103 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Young
of the coat pockets. Further testing confirmed Alfredson’s belief. ¶6 The State charged Young
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7022 - 2017-09-20
of the coat pockets. Further testing confirmed Alfredson’s belief. ¶6 The State charged Young
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7022 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶9 Officers testified that inside the gun case was an envelope with two test-fired .40 caliber
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015033 - 2025-09-24
. ¶9 Officers testified that inside the gun case was an envelope with two test-fired .40 caliber
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015033 - 2025-09-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
.” Id. The United States Supreme Court has developed a test, the Townsend/Tucker test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30845 - 2014-09-15
.” Id. The United States Supreme Court has developed a test, the Townsend/Tucker test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30845 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mark O. Williams
, the test set forth above applies to both challenges. See id. ¶14 Williams’ double jeopardy claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5692 - 2017-09-19
, the test set forth above applies to both challenges. See id. ¶14 Williams’ double jeopardy claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5692 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Milwaukee Police Association v. The City of Milwaukee
Teachers adopted a three-factor test to determine whether attorneys fees should be awarded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12247 - 2017-09-21
Teachers adopted a three-factor test to determine whether attorneys fees should be awarded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12247 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark A. Flagstadt
are not probationers. See id. at 21-22. “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a commonsense test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5585 - 2005-03-31
are not probationers. See id. at 21-22. “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a commonsense test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5585 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence pursuant to the three-part test from State v. Sullivan, 216 Wis. 2d 768, 771-73, 576 N.W.2d 30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1089580 - 2026-03-12
evidence pursuant to the three-part test from State v. Sullivan, 216 Wis. 2d 768, 771-73, 576 N.W.2d 30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1089580 - 2026-03-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 380 U.S. 609, 614 (1965). “The test for determining if there has been an impermissible comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98739 - 2014-09-15
, 380 U.S. 609, 614 (1965). “The test for determining if there has been an impermissible comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98739 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
are virtually unchallengeable.” Id. at 690. ¶12 The prejudice prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34575 - 2014-09-15
are virtually unchallengeable.” Id. at 690. ¶12 The prejudice prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34575 - 2014-09-15
State v. Johnny Lacy
claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to seek independent DNA testing, but again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16081 - 2005-03-31
claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to seek independent DNA testing, but again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16081 - 2005-03-31