Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22681 - 22690 of 63595 for records/1000.
Search results 22681 - 22690 of 63595 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147090 - 2017-09-21
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147090 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jerome M. Nelligan
test. Nelligan claims this finding was clearly erroneous. Because the record supports the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12696 - 2017-09-21
test. Nelligan claims this finding was clearly erroneous. Because the record supports the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12696 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471012 - 2022-01-12
-CRNM 2 no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471012 - 2022-01-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
ineffective. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227135 - 2018-11-13
ineffective. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227135 - 2018-11-13
[PDF]
State v. William J. Perry
the trial court of additional, accurate information about Perry's criminal record. Therefore, we affirm.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9732 - 2017-09-19
the trial court of additional, accurate information about Perry's criminal record. Therefore, we affirm.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9732 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
out that the record did not include any document establishing that Slocum filed a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112630 - 2017-09-21
out that the record did not include any document establishing that Slocum filed a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112630 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Andrew G. Busalacchi
that occurred before he became record title “owner” but after his offer to purchase the property was accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10089 - 2017-09-19
that occurred before he became record title “owner” but after his offer to purchase the property was accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10089 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Nos. 2021AP2030-CRNM 2021AP2031-CRNM 2 record, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606134 - 2022-12-30
. Nos. 2021AP2030-CRNM 2021AP2031-CRNM 2 record, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606134 - 2022-12-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267949 - 2020-07-09
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267949 - 2020-07-09
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95780 - 2013-04-18
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95780 - 2013-04-18